| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 1,365 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
1264 Posts |
Thanks 16609.. The left dot is elongated and the right one is as well , but note as much. I will look at the three sites to see if I can find an attribution.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19961 Posts |
Proofs are very difficult to grade from pictures but it does look like a very nice one.
PR64-66
Lincoln Cent Lover!VERDI-CARE™ INVENTOR https://verdi.care/
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1048 Posts |
The reverse is exquisite --- up in 67/68 territory. Obverse looks PF64. Should net out to at least PF66, maybe CAM.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15453 Posts |
Very difficult to see with those dark surfaces.
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18673 Posts |
proofs are a nightmare to photograph. if you add more light you'll probably add glare and washout the surfaces. based on these there a couple areas that I'm unsure of. the obv right field appears to have some disturbance. the reverse appears to have a scratch or mark running all the way along the top of PLURIBUS UNUM.
can you confirm these if they are actually there? if they are not then i'll put it at PF66 maybe PF67. tough call on CAM without better photos
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1264 Posts |
Thanks for yourcomments.The coin appears to be a DDR. I will post on proper forum later. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1264 Posts |
Reverse E.PLU doesn't appear to have scratches. Hard to get good phots of obverse field. Thanks for you comments.. I'm gonna keep it as a nice example of a proof.   |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
These partial pics are of no help.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1264 Posts |
Sorry..I was responding to "PANZALDI" comments when I posted additional photos. Had no intentions of over riding original photos.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Got it. Even in high grades this proof isn't worth much. But always a good idea to work on your photography skills.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74444 Posts |
Maybe PF65 at best.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18673 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1264 Posts |
panzaldi... Then Wexler and Vista are wrong when they post attributions for a 1957 proof one cent coin. There are at least 11 indicated. Have I been researching the wrong way all these months? Thanks
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18673 Posts |
i was only looking at PCGS. they have none listed. never heard of Wexler and Vista before
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1264 Posts |
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 1,365 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 10/02/2023 11:52 pm
