| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 942 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Wow. I'll say MS-62 as well.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9792 Posts |
with this much obverse scuffing and contact marks  with a grade of MS62 No need for a details grade. A "details" designation is really for something that isn't from normal mint and circulation wear and tear, like damage (on purpose or accidental), cleaning, polishing, and artificial enhancement. "Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440Edited by westcoin
10/31/2023 5:44 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
I think it gets to MS63.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Clearly there are appealing aspects to the fields and the luster is super, but damages to the cheek and nose are severe. Grade aside, I doubt it would fetch 63 money.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
Shallow scuff marks on Lib's cheek and eagle's breast feathers, that have disturbed the luster, are a bit unsightly.
MS-62.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1518 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
I suspect it got a 63 due to great luster, TPG's love luster, but technically I'd agree with the crowd MS-62. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74629 Posts |
I'll say MS-63.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1776 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18687 Posts |
the 89(O) are mostly soft and weak. i'd say this one fits that. luster looks good but the eye appeal due to blotchy toning is on the lower end. the scuffs on the cheek and neck are pretty heavy and right in the sweet spot and the scratch in the left field really draws the eye there. some small marks and scuffs on the reverse fields
MS62. the luster may pull this up a tad
good photos
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
509 Posts |
Here she is  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2282 Posts |
Hard pass for me.
Too distracting of marks, buy the coin, not the holder.
You realize when you know how to think, it empowers you far beyond those who know only what to think.
-Neil deGrasse Tyson
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18687 Posts |
i'd call it a low end 63. high end 62. they probably went with the 63 due to the luster
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9792 Posts |
Yep I can see the MS63 for luster and nice original surfaces, I'd pass to due to amount of and deepness of scuffs, hits on the main focal area of the coin. Still think that alone makes it an MS62+
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440 |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36830 Posts |
Can't see this one above MS-62.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 942 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 10/31/2023 5:43 pm
