| Author |
Replies: 18 / Views: 1,387 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
I think it is too worn to know for sure. John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1770 Posts |
 Great pictures, too bad so worn. 
Edited by Sharks 11/30/2023 5:44 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3848 Posts |
First impression, I do not think it is a straight clip.
Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Even in hand I doubt a clip can be clearly corrorborated.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
6554 Posts |
fwiw, the coin arrived today. As understood, there is a considerable amount of wear. Is there anything I should image closely?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2757 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2757 Posts |
Actually, I see something else too: can you take the diameter of the coin? Between the right side of the N in UNITED to the other side of the coin, roughly to the C in AMERICA?
Edited by robbudo 12/06/2023 2:21 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2376 Posts |
With the circulation wear of the coin , any Blakesley effect opposite the anomaly or Smith effect at the anomaly may have disappeared. The circulation wear is also curiously related to the anomaly. The obverse seems more worn and the reverse more protected at the "clip". Is there anything to see on the edge of the coin at the anomaly. A possible cause could have been a hit to the edge of the coin. Flattening that part of the edge and dragging/bulging the displaced metal towards the reverse. This would expose the obverse design elements and protect the reverse design elements at the point of damage,to ,and from ,circulation wear. Just something to consider.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4233 Posts |
My first thought was that someone was doing a little silver mining, i.e. "clipping" in the PMD sense. I also noted the difference in wear - protected near the clip on the reverse but more worn there on the obverse. So I wonder if the coin is slightly bent there from the clipping.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
6554 Posts |
I will work on some photos this evening. The only calipers I have are analog (mechanical) drafting compasses, so I will have to check with my metal working and machinist friends to see if I can borrow a digital calipers.
I will say now, the coin is worn. The reeds are gone around the perimeter, except as faint memories.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3179 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
6554 Posts |
Still waiting on the calipers. I haven't forgotten about this coin, but I've been really busy with holiday prep (lights are up!). My coin stuff has been mostly online, unless it can fit in my little axial photo box.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
6554 Posts |
Now that I know more about clipped planchets, I decided to revisit this coin. It doesn't seem like anything further could be concluded on this one (although I am always willing to be proved wrong). Whatever removed the missing metal, the heavy circulation wear has erased the cause.    Moved from the Under Examination box to the Kids and Starter Coins box.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Agree, you're unlikely to be sure at this point.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
97314 Posts |
what does the edge of the 'clip' look like?
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 1,387 |
Page 2 of 2
|