| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 949 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'll say VF-35+. Most attractive.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19201 Posts |
I could see VF40. Nice example.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18687 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
10595 Posts |
I agree with XF40 - nice eye appeal.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36839 Posts |
Nice original looking EF-40.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
745 Posts |
Nice coin. XF-40. Check it for a re-punched mintmark, there are 3.
I can't tell from the picture
Tim Hughes
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19964 Posts |
The wheat grains are a little too flat for EF. Nice coin!
VF-35
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Ear detail just isn't there for EF.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10595 Posts |
Quote:
The wheat grains are a little too flat for EF. I noticed that but would the extra "Eye Appeal" from the condition of the coin push it to the next level? |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74677 Posts |
I'll go with VF. Nice coin!
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19964 Posts |
Quote:
I noticed that but would the extra "Eye Appeal" from the condition of the coin push it to the next level? That only applies generally to mint state coins. Circulated coins pretty much grade on the amount of wear and nothing else. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10595 Posts |
Quote:
Circulated coins pretty much grade on the amount of wear  I will have to remember that. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18687 Posts |
Quote:
Ear detail just isn't there for EF. just interested...disregard ear detail would you call the coin XF? |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
To me, the whole temple area is too worn for an EF.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2189 Posts |
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 949 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 03/05/2024 11:11 am
