| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,688 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3535 Posts |
Need to post far better quality photos.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
10601 Posts |
Quote: if a RPM exists for this date or not. The only one on VV is for a proof 70-S. I'd advise checking the other sites.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
75265 Posts |
 To CCF! We're going to need much better quality photos.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
190135 Posts |
 to the Community!
|
|
Moderator
 United States
98600 Posts |
 the images are far too blurry to see the possible RPM. as for the 'misplaced' MM - these were placed on the die by hand - so the location will be different from die to die.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Sharper images needed for sure.  to the CCF!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7174 Posts |
 to the CCF As you stated there are low and high MM on nickels that are recognized, I don't know if the 70S is one of them. Seems like this one should be recognized.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6602 Posts |
It's low, but it isn't in contact with the ribbon or the ponytail. I will pull out a roll of 1970-S circulation nickels tonight and see if there are any with that particular placement.
|
|
New Member
 United States
27 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
10601 Posts |
That mintmark location, although it looks strange, is more common than you think. I just took a quick look at ebay and there are 70-S nickels on there just like yours with no mention of the mm placement.   
|
|
New Member
 United States
27 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
The money on that coin is in the annealing error. John1 
|
|
New Member
 United States
27 Posts |
I saw that- but why is the primary error listed as a misplaced mint mark first and foremost?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6602 Posts |
 I ran across this example tonight. I think it's just common for early 1970s decade mint marks to be low on nickels. I have several more that are only a bit higher.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
10601 Posts |
Quote: The money on that coin is in the annealing error. It's also labeled "FRED WEINBERG COLLECTION" - who is one of the nation's leading error coin specialist. That also would raise the final value. Plus an S mint coin can't really be compared to a D mint coin. For Denver that year the mintmark may indeed be lower than all of the others with a low mintage total.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,688 |
Page 2 of 2
|