| Author |
Replies: 17 / Views: 4,723 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Nice to have you with us, jman. That's a familiar nick - perhaps we've crossed paths elsewhere on the Internet.
The first thing you need to know is that those streaks on the reverse may or may not prevent the coin from being considered "original," and achieving a grade from a respected third-party grader. Although the color is not unreasonable for silver oxidation, the pattern is a bit odd.
With that said, the coin certainly looks Uncirculated and a guesstimate (the best we could do without very accurate photographs) would be MS62 or 63. That would put its' value at or north of $250-ish if considered gradable, rather less if not.
|
|
New Member
 United States
9 Posts |
Thanks SuperDave!
The streaks are from a paperclip that was across the envelope the coin was in.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Quote: The streaks are from a paperclip that was across the envelope the coin was in.
Extremely cool. The envelope must have had a minor sulfur content, the substance which normally reacts to oxidize silver, and only the place where the envelope was actually forced against the coin toned. That's what I consider a very neat feature, but would likely be considered "artificial" by a grader.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23731 Posts |
Details appear to be MS-63, On the reverse there looks like some type of pitting in the field above and below IN GOD WE TRUST. That concerns me a little, I'm not sure what might have caused that. Dave any ideas on that?
|
|
New Member
 United States
9 Posts |
I inherited roughly 100-120 Morgan silver dollars from my uncle, most of them in less than UNC condition. Anything I should keep my eye out for? Thanks Again! jman
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23731 Posts |
Any CC in higher grades are good keepers and of cause any 1893's and 1895.
|
|
New Member
 United States
9 Posts |
I have the following 1893/1895, if any sound interesting let me know and I will post pics.
1895-O labeled "Fair" x2 1893-P labeled "Fair" 1893-D labeled "Fair"
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23731 Posts |
Post pictures of all of them.
|
|
New Member
 United States
9 Posts |
1893-D labeled "Fair" - This coin is labeled "D" but the mark looks more like an "O", more on the way.  
|
|
New Member
 United States
9 Posts |
1893 - P  
|
|
New Member
 United States
9 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 United States
9 Posts |
So what do you guys think?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3076 Posts |
marks around the in god we trust look like chatter marks, accented by the light Cool coins,,,,, say any body want to inherit me some coins?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23731 Posts |
I would grade the 1893-O at VG-8, with an estimate of $150, the 1893-P VG-10, maybe F-12. @$150. The first 1895-O I would grade at G-4, @$200, and the second 1895-O F-12, @$325. These are on estimates, Red Book only give pricing for VF-20 and above. Still these are very nice coins. I'm still missing these to complete my Morgan date collection. They get very expensive in the grade that I'm looking for.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2373 Posts |
 with echizento. Nice Morgans for sure. That 1893 is exactly what I've been looking for to go in a date set. It is difficult to find a semi key dates that haven't been "cleaned" in one way or another. Please don't pretty them up if you are new to the hobby. It will ruin their value. nlp
Edited by nlp coins 02/13/2010 09:49 am
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 4,723 |
Page 2 of 2
|