|
This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.| Author |
Replies: 28 / Views: 3,836 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
294 Posts |
A reason why I don't do ebay. But, unless you can prove that this comment by this seller has directly affected pricing on ebay, and hurt your selling on the site, you shouldn't have much of a case. And you just started down the road to defamation of a fellow seller (in the hopes of limiting competition?). I find it hard to believe that this falls under "hateful/profane" content policy. When was the last time you pulled a pristine example of a circulating coin out of your pocket? He basically states the coin is cleaned (whether he admits to doing the cleaning is really irrelevant). A knowledgeable buyer will know the difference anyway, so fleecing the uninformed is the only advantage to suppressing comments like his.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1666 Posts |
Omaha - Fleecing the uninformed is exactly what this is about. the uninformed today are tomorrow's serious collectors. There is enough ignorance already, why should anyone benefit from spreading more of it. Have you ever been a seller? And would you appreciate another seller making a false negative statement that also pertains to what you are selling? If it affected you, you would be all up in arms. I believe that standard should extend to others as well. (Yes, I believe in social justice and jurisprudence). See my example above: If I list an item on ebay that is fake and instead of writing that my item is fake... I write "remember, 90% of coins on ebay are fake". You would not see a problem with that? Can you really not see it is this seller who is hurting the competition? When I was speaking to ebay I made sure to say that they should not cancel the seller's listings or take any action against their account, only to inform them through official channels that their statement is mis-informative and can only be hurtful to other sellers. I need not prove any personal damage. This is not a court case. It's just common sense, man. And I find fairly pristine examples of coins 30+ years old pretty regularly, as I am sure you do because our pocket change has plenty of them. But, this is besides the point. Unfounded statements that benefit a seller at the expense of others is simply not ethical and grounds for those on the receiving end to take action.
Edited by Numismat 09/13/2010 1:03 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
294 Posts |
Quote: Omaha - Fleecing the uninformed is exactly what this is about. the uninformed today are tomorrow's serious collectors. There is enough ignorance already, why should anyone benefit from spreading more of it. You misinterpreted my statement, I think. I don't think this guy is trying to fleece anyone. He implies that his coin is cleaned, and if you were to ask him that question, I would be willing to bet he would say it was cleaned. While his percentage (90%) may be off, how many sellers do you think list cleaned coins without ever mentioning the word "Cleaned". I think this guy may be doing the uninformed a favor by making them think about the condion of the next coin they think about purchasing. Quote: Have you ever been a seller? And would you appreciate another seller making a false negative statement that also pertains to what you are selling? No, but I have bought a few things from ebay. It was things like shill bidding, inflated shipping costs, and high starting bids that turned me off the site. I don't believe the statement is totally false. For me (as a seller) it would be "if the shoe fits...". If it didn't apply, I wouldn't worry about it. The informed buyer will know what he/she's looking at. So my question to you is, what market are targeting, the serious collector, or the spontaneous, uninformed buyer? Quote: If it affected you, you would be all up in arms. I believe that standard should extend to others as well. (Yes, I believe in social justice and jurisprudence). I think I answered this above. But to reiterate, if I was an honest seller, no, this statement would not rile me at all. Quote:See my example above: If I list an item on ebay that is fake and instead of writing that my item is fake... I write "remember, 90% of coins on ebay are fake". You would not see a problem with that? Again, see above. Quote:Can you really not see it is this seller who is hurting the competition? When I was speaking to ebay I made sure to say that they should not cancel the seller's listings or take any action against their account, only to inform them through official channels that their statement is mis-informative and can only be hurtful to other sellers. What evidence do you have to back up this statement? Has sales or prices fallen dramatically because of this statement? You're going to have a really hard time convincing me of that. Quote: I need not prove any personal damage. This is not a court case. It's just common sense, man. Not yet, but if the seller's sales are hurt because of your accusations, and you can't back up what you're saying, it's a good bet he may seek retaliatory action. Quote: And I find fairly pristine examples of coins 30+ years old pretty regularly, as I am sure you do because our pocket change has plenty of them. But, this is besides the point. Unfounded statements that benefit a seller at the expense of others is simply not ethical and grounds for those on the receiving end to take action I rarely pull three year old coins out my pocket that could be described as in uncirculated condition, let alone 30 year old coins. Again, he is referring to coins "in circulation". He is not talking about MS slapped examples. Like I said, 90% may not be an accurate figure, but I bet it's more than you think. Your statement about how this affects sales, at this point, is also unfounded, as you've shown nothing to to indicate that his statement has affected anyone's sales. Unless you can directly tie declines to this statement, you have effectively done the same thing...made an unfounded statement that benefits a seller at the expense of another. For the record, I only use ebay now as a price guide. But I do attend quite a few live auctions. Auctions are always going to be a crap-shoot. I attend auctions because I look for bargains. If I wanted to simply pay the list price for an item, I'd buy it in a store. I have gotten some incredible deals at auctions, and I have seen common date silver coins go for way above value because someone brought a copy of The Red Book and used that as a starting price. I once saw common date Silver Eagles go for $45-50 because they were in 75 cent Harris snap-lock cases. A lot of factors affect the bidding at auction. You have to be willing to take your chances as a seller.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1666 Posts |
If a seller's sales are hurt as a result of having to be completely honest, rather than indirectly stating his coins are cleaned, that is completely justified IMO. It's much better than many seller's sales being hurt because one seller chooses to be lawyerly about the condition of his items, rather than straightforwardly honest as I and many other sellers are. Don't get me wrong... I have been tempted to do the same. To intellectualize anything that would cause a lower sale price in a manner such as this seller has. But, I realize that is unethical, so I put honesty before profit.
Actually it was my mistake for not realizing the proper definition of "fleecing". I meant to say that this is all about protecting uninformed newbie coin buyers. I guess that would be "sheaparding", lol.
The bottom line here is that the seller's statement cannot possibly help anyone but the seller themselves, while there is so much potential for it to hurt sellers and mis-inform novice buyers. The risk-benefit statistic here is completely skewed in the direction of risk, when looking from other sellers point of view. Of course, it's completely skewed towards benefit from this seller's point of view.
This is pure selfishness. We all have our rights, but only so long as they do not infringe on the rights of others. This seller sorely refuses to see that. And sure, I'll be "that guy", who busts their hump to see justice done, even though many sellers have talked about this and not actually bothered to do anything.
I have worked so hard to build a reputation as an ethical and honest coin seller and I'm certainly not the only one. Is it right for someone to undermine mine and other people's reputation so they can make a few extra bucks? heck no!
Edited by Numismat 09/13/2010 9:35 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2448 Posts |
I can only say that 70% of the coins I looked at today were obviously cleaned; flat luster, shiny surfaces, grey appearance, no patina. The sellers at this antique mall made no statement as to if they had been cleaned but graded most of their coins at MS67. The other 30% were also generally graded MS65+ and there were marks all over the primary grading areas. At Least this ebay seller alluded to the fact that they may have been cleaned. Every time I announce to a seller, "this coin's been cleaned", he always counters with, "not by me". What really amazes me that he'll never lower his price, though it's obviously been cleaned. Now that's the Rub!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1666 Posts |
carmykle - I completely understand what you are talking about, and it's a practice that's plaguing ebay. At the very least paypal will usually have your back in such instances. However, the problem is not that this seller cleans or sells cleaned coins, it's that they make a general statement that everyone else is also doing it. People like me take that to heart, because it undermines the reputation we have built up by directly describing cleaned/damaged coins as such and not just saying "everyone is doing it" without saying that the specific coin is cleaned. Thanks for chiming in!
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Numismat, if you feel I showed you contempt, that's OK with me. I didn't; if I had chosen the course of contempt, it would have been abundantly clear even to a non-English reader. I feel (as the rest of your postings in this thread tend to bear out) that you're way oversensitive and overreacting to this seller's verbiage. Especially considering the seller you are on ebay. You are one of my favorite World coin sellers on ebay. I peruse your stuff all the time. Your methods and your coins are above reproach, and you've nothing to fear from this one pathetic competitor. If you want to counteract him, don't  about it here. Work some language into your auctions which directly contravene what he's saying. It's much less a concern with World coins than US coins, but that guy is pretty close to correct regarding US issues. He has the timeframe off - I'd use 50 years instead of 20 - but older than that, it's a reasonable conclusion that at least 80% of "clean" US coins have been cleaned. Furthermore, I feel you're greatly overestimating the percentage of "respectable" sellers on ebay, even with World coins. You are not as common as you seem to think.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1666 Posts |
SuperDave, First of all, thank you for complementing my auctions. I do take pride in what I do. When you tell me I have no business buying coins on ebay based on a misreading of what I was trying to say, how can I call it anything but contempt? I know misunderstandings happen all the time, especially when typing without the clear context of face-to-face speech. I do realize that I am over-reacting, but honestly that is sometimes necessary to do. I have seen way more outrageous statements in the past years and e-mailed with some pretty unreasonable people. To this seller's credit, after e-mailing with him he has added a piece that basically limits his statement to silver coins and as such, it's largely true. It's certainly commendable, as he is one of the few sellers I have spoken with on ebay who are reasonable. By talking about it here I was hoping to get feedback on whether I was just crazy or if other sellers would feel the same. Didn't really get much seller feedback, but it was quite interesting non-the-less. =) Sorry about any misunderstanding. I know I can be long winded and that makes reading through it a chore.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
The statements of one random seller on ebay that I have never heard of do not affect my sales one iota. I couldn't care less what they state in their auctions, that is on them. My coins are judged solely on my description and my presentation. I am an ANA member and proudly display the ANA logo in all my auctions, I have to think that holds more sway over sellers than someone totally unrelated to me.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Quote:When you tell me I have no business buying coins on ebay based on a misreading of what I was trying to say, how can I call it anything but contempt? You could call it SuperDave's fruit-fly attention span leading to high-g acceleration in the wrong direction, which is more like the truth. 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
294 Posts |
Quote: If a seller's sales are hurt as a result of having to be completely honest, rather than indirectly stating his coins are cleaned, that is completely justified IMO. It's much better than many seller's sales being hurt because one seller chooses to be lawyerly about the condition of his items, rather than straightforwardly honest as I and many other sellers are. Don't get me wrong... I have been tempted to do the same. To intellectualize anything that would cause a lower sale price in a manner such as this seller has. But, I realize that is unethical, so I put honesty before profit. Dude, I have no idea what you just said here. You keep talking about this hurting sales, but you have yet to provide any examples that this statement has caused the ebay market to bottom out. Quote: Actually it was my mistake for not realizing the proper definition of "fleecing". I meant to say that this is all about protecting uninformed newbie coin buyers. I guess that would be "sheaparding", lol. At what point do we become the policemen of coin buying? The information is out there (take this board, for instance). If the "newbie coin buyer" is uninformed, that's his fault. We can't force the information down anybody's throat. If this seller was trying to pass off counterfeit coins as real, that's one issue. If he's trying to pass cleaned coins off as uncleaned, that's an issue. He's done none of the above. His statement is neither illegal nor that much off the mark. Quote: The bottom line here is that the seller's statement cannot possibly help anyone but the seller themselves, while there is so much potential for it to hurt sellers and mis-inform novice buyers. The risk-benefit statistic here is completely skewed in the direction of risk, when looking from other sellers point of view. Of course, it's completely skewed towards benefit from this seller's point of view. As for the first line, welcome to the wonderful world of capitalism. As for the rest, again, you have yet to show where this causes the collapse of the entire ebay system, or even personal loss to you. Quote: This is pure selfishness. We all have our rights, but only so long as they do not infringe on the rights of others. This seller sorely refuses to see that. And sure, I'll be "that guy", who busts their hump to see justice done, even though many sellers have talked about this and not actually bothered to do anything.
It is. But what of your rantings about the subject? How has he infringed on anybody's' rights? What justice are you looking for? Again, the only thing I see is that you are offended by a statement in another seller's listing. You have produced no evidence that this did nothing more than get you on a soapbox. Who's been hurt (financially, not feelings) by his statement? Quote: I have worked so hard to build a reputation as an ethical and honest coin seller and I'm certainly not the only one. Is it right for someone to undermine mine and other people's reputation so they can make a few extra bucks? heck no! Did he actually mention you by name in the listing? How has your reputation (not your feelings) as "an ethical and honest coin seller" been hurt by this? I'm just having a hard time understanding why you feel so strongly about this. You have provided nothing to indicate you or anybody else has been "damaged" (not offended, which you obviously are) by this. Be thankful you don't sell cars. You can't use "ethical" and "car salesman" in the same sentence. ( DISCLAIMER: I know there are honest car salesmen out there, but you all know the stereotype. I in no way intend to discredit used car salesmen).
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2669 Posts |
That statement in the listings sounds like an attempt at pre-emptive defense, but the wording needs work. They may not even realize how they are coming across to (some) people reading it. If (and that's a big if) that statement would hurt other sellers, then it would certainly hurt their own sales.. something no seller I know would do on purpose. As you've noted above, sometimes there are misunderstandings (especially when you only have the written word), and sometimes it takes some conversation to either clear things up or prove your initial impression. And Dave's right.. if he had been showing contempt, you'd know  I've read similar auctions where the seller is defensive in the listing before you even buy anything (not just with coins, either).. total turn off, and someone I would never buy from. In the end, they're only hurting themselves. Newbies are newbies for only so long 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1666 Posts |
Superdave - I got it dude. I too have those moments, more than I'd like to admit.  xshift - You are absolutely right. This seller was not intentionally trying to undermine anyone, it just sometimes comes across that way depending on who is reading the listing. Like I said in the previous post, I commend the seller for understanding why some other sellers may feel that way and adding a portion that makes it quite honest. He was able to look at it from other people's point of view and realized that he would feel similarly if the situation was reversed. I just tend to get a little paranoid because I have dealt with many seemingly minor, almost irrelevant, things like this that became quite significant because nothing was done at the beginning. Again, thanks for your thoughtful comments guys/gals! The beauty of selling coins is that there is no real competition between sellers. I mean, how often will any two particular sellers have the same coin, in the same grade for sale at the same time? Seems to me like almost never. So, I don't see any point for statements in item listings that speak of the community or the hobby as a whole (that's what forums are for  ).
Edited by Numismat 09/14/2010 9:19 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2448 Posts |
Wow! You guys are "doin full 8 point wufferdills"! Those a tougher than a Full-stall Prop-hanger or Vatican Reversal.  I now understand where each is arguing from but more importantly delighted to realize what a great bunch of dealers and numismatists are involved in the forum. Your ethics should be taught in business schools. Maybe then we wouldn't have the Ponzi Schemers we have today. Thank you for your illuminating debate. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1666 Posts |
carmykle - I believe I speak for all of us when I thank you sincerely for your kind compliments! =)
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 28 / Views: 3,836 |
Page 2 of 2
|
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use
|
| Coin Community Forum |
© 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums |
| It took 0.41 seconds to rattle this change. |
 |
|
| |
| |