| Author |
 Replies: 20 / Views: 4,604 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
I would also say.. PL-65.  |
|
Valued Member
Canada
307 Posts |
the coin definitely looks PL to me also....nice coin though
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1248 Posts |
Anacs....MS67
ICCS MS 63, maybe 64
PL...am not sure, hard to see on the Images.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
PL? Fields do not seem to be mirrored. Might be the photography...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
4944 Posts |
Here is another in different light.  Quote:
Anacs....MS67
ICCS MS 63, maybe 64
PL...am not sure, hard to see on the Images. Yes. The coin is ANACS MS-67 with PL fields. (I contacted ANACS and they said the coin was a business strike with proof like fields, but thats another story.) Here are pictures of the holder/coin.  Edited by Canadian-Banknotes
12/09/2010 5:34 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
9868 Posts |
It' a PL coin from a PL set.That's how ANACS grades Canadian PL coins.Of course they are going to defend their position and tell you it's a business strike with PL fields,because that is the American definition.Try and sell this coin at a major Canadian auction,you'll find that it's a $80 coin not a $2000 coin.That's one reason you shouldn't send Canadian coins to ANACS,if you insist on sending them to a US grading company send them to PCGS,as they are more in touch with the realities of Canadian coin collecting.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4944 Posts |
Quote:
That's one reason you shouldn't send Canadian coins to ANACS I didn't send the coin to ANACS. I bought the coin like this. |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
902 Posts |
Exellent, what did you pay for it ?
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
250 Posts |
DBM, would there be any reason to use PCGS over ICCS or CCCS for Canadian coins? Are they considered as reliable for Canadian coins?
on a similar note, I recently purchased an 1876 1 cent Canadian graded ef-40 by National Numismatic Association...can only say I'll never send them one of my coins, or buy another certified by them...at best this coin is vf-20.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
85 Posts |
I see MS-65 but it mould be nice to have in hand and look at properly. Maybe could be little better than MS-65
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
9868 Posts |
It's a PL coin from a PL set.It isn't MS anything
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1248 Posts |
twocentsworth....
YOU must have missed all the posts about NNC.... basement graders....
I am surprised..... they are close to , well, I forgot the words now....
just Google them... and the words will show...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1051 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1051 Posts |
Quote:
DBM, would there be any reason to use PCGS over ICCS or CCCS for Canadian coins? Since DBM didn'y reply: 1) the US has an estimated total collector base of 20 million, and those that like slabs prefer PCGS and NGC, and largely ignore anything ICCS/CCCS. 2) Registry sets 3) PCGS has the best technology, a better pop database than anything in Canada, the most comprehensive website, and they are the #1 TPG in the world. If you are certifying 1859 cent varieties, a Canadian TPG that knows the material or will work with you on attribution is the way to go. For your 1921 half, 1936 dot, or 1911 dollar...PCGS is the way to go. Both the Belzberg and Canadiana collections were auctioned in New York, not in Canada. |
|
Valued Member
Canada
268 Posts |
Looks like a PL strike due to the cameo effect.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 20 / Views: 4,604 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 12/08/2010 07:29 am
