Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsRoyal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. 300,000 items to help build your collection! Specializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1894-O Morgan

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
First Page Previous Page  Showing last 15 replies.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 31 / Views: 2,221Next Topic Page 3 of 3
Pillar of the Community
United States
1703 Posts
 Posted 11/26/2006  3:53 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add TLS5933 to your friends list
quote:
Originally posted by SuperDave

Generally speaking, AU+"Blast white" = cleaning, in almost all cases. That's a given. I thought about it, but didn't mention it.

For the record, it's not difficult to dip a coin without losing the luster. You just have to know when to say when.


I would go along with that except ANACS had not labled it cleaned on the first submission.They can't be right on both counts.
Moderator
Learn More...
United States
23522 Posts
 Posted 11/26/2006  4:33 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SsuperDdave to your friends list
quote:
Originally posted by TLS5933

quote:
Originally posted by SuperDave

Generally speaking, AU+"Blast white" = cleaning, in almost all cases. That's a given. I thought about it, but didn't mention it.

For the record, it's not difficult to dip a coin without losing the luster. You just have to know when to say when.


I would go along with that except ANACS had not labled it cleaned on the first submission.They can't be right on both counts.



Correct. Obviously, they can't tell for sure. Neither can you or I, if it was done right.
Pillar of the Community
United States
1703 Posts
 Posted 11/26/2006  4:42 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add TLS5933 to your friends list
Dave, I guess my whole point of this was not just the 1894 coin issue but the fact they down graded all the high value Morgans (4 of the 5 I sent in) and kept the 1900 Morgan I sent in at MS64 and the luster on that coin is almost non-existent.It actually looks cleaned.
Moderator
Learn More...
United States
23522 Posts
 Posted 11/26/2006  5:11 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SsuperDdave to your friends list
The lack of quality of the care applied to Morgan working dies, and the quantity of coins being struck by each die (approximately 150,000 per die for New Orleans issues) led to wide variations in the relative luster of strikes. I would expect lessened luster, especially on a coin which is a weak strike as the result of lessened die pressure, done to extend the working life of the die.

None of this defends ANACS being unable to determine whether the coin was cleaned of not, but it's not as black and white as one might think, especially with Morgans.
Rest in Peace
United States
2684 Posts
 Posted 11/26/2006  8:36 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Morgan Fred to your friends list
Some early New Year's resolutions I make to myself:

1. Never collect New Orleans Morgans. Too .

2. Never again try to grade O mint Morgans from an image.

3. SOME cleaned coins are impossible to detect as cleaned. Others can be very deceiving. See topic https://goccf.com/t/8256 asking James Taylor (formerly of ANACS) on the subject of grading cleaned coins.

4. Never again discuss TPGs with my friend Rick. Too . I want to stay friends.

5. Stop chasing after Emmie Lou; she's beyond my reach. Oops, wrong forum.

/s and Notarized This Date: 26 November 2006

W. Frederick Stevens
-------------------------
Pillar of the Community
United States
1703 Posts
 Posted 11/26/2006  9:02 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add TLS5933 to your friends list
quote:
Originally posted by Morgan Fred

Some early New Year's resolutions I make to myself:

1. Never collect New Orleans Morgans. Too .

2. Never again try to grade O mint Morgans from an image.

3. SOME cleaned coins are impossible to detect as cleaned. Others can be very deceiving. See topic https://goccf.com/t/8256 asking James Taylor (formerly of ANACS) on the subject of grading cleaned coins.

4. Never again discuss TPGs with my friend Rick. Too . I want to stay friends.

5. Stop chasing after Emmie Lou; she's beyond my reach. Oops, wrong forum.

/s and Notarized This Date: 26 November 2006

W. Frederick Stevens
-------------------------


Probably good advice for all of us but I doubt if we will follow any of it.
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts
 Posted 11/26/2006  10:56 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Bryan1315 to your friends list
New year resolutions are only good on January 1st, they expire at 12 midnight January 2nd
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1267 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2006  04:18 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add hadleydog to your friends list
That coin has a funky look to it, and my first thought was AU and cleaned. The O-mints are notorious for weak strikes, but not that weak. Lightly circulated, and lightly cleaned. Sorry, but from what I can see it looks like anacs got it right the second time.
Pillar of the Community
United States
1703 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2006  06:32 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add TLS5933 to your friends list
quote:
Originally posted by hadleydog

That coin has a funky look to it, and my first thought was AU and cleaned. The O-mints are notorious for weak strikes, but not that weak. Lightly circulated, and lightly cleaned. Sorry, but from what I can see it looks like anacs got it right the second time.


Actually,I have seen much weaker struck O's graded MS63-64.The funky look is probably more to my picture taking than the coin itself. I try to use natural daylight when taking coin pictures and on good days I get exellent results but on overcast,dark days I have to add light and things go bad.
Rest in Peace
United States
2684 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2006  09:58 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Morgan Fred to your friends list
quote:
Originally posted by hadleydog

That coin has a funky look to it, and my first thought was AU and cleaned. The O-mints are notorious for weak strikes, but not that weak. Lightly circulated, and lightly cleaned. Sorry, but from what I can see it looks like anacs got it right the second time.



Rick (Metalman) has an O mint Morgan (I'll look for the topic later) that created a big fuss. Because it was such a weak strike, we just could not decide if it was heavily circulated or Mint State. He's been holding it over my head ever since.
Pillar of the Community
United States
7123 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2006  12:18 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Metalman to your friends list
The pics of the coin are in my photo gallery !! 1888-O Good luck !!

Rick
Edited by Metalman
11/27/2006 12:23 pm
Rest in Peace
United States
2684 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2006  12:57 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Morgan Fred to your friends list
Here's the thread which almost started a civil war: http://www.coincommunity.com/forum/...&whichpage=1

So Rick, when you gonna send it over so I can take a close look at it?
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1267 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2006  2:55 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add hadleydog to your friends list
quote:
Originally posted by Morgan Fred

quote:
Originally posted by hadleydog

That coin has a funky look to it, and my first thought was AU and cleaned. The O-mints are notorious for weak strikes, but not that weak. Lightly circulated, and lightly cleaned. Sorry, but from what I can see it looks like anacs got it right the second time.



Rick (Metalman) has an O mint Morgan (I'll look for the topic later) that created a big fuss. Because it was such a weak strike, we just could not decide if it was heavily circulated or Mint State. He's been holding it over my head ever since.



I just looked at the 88-0, and that has to be the worst strike I have ever seen on a Morgan. Was it ever graded by a TPG? My guess would have been au-50, but man-o-man you could argue it either way. Cool, cool coin!
The coin in this thread still looks funky, and I don't think it's the images. No spots, no major hits or reeding, blast white and way too 'shiney', lots of teeny tiny undefined scratches all over including the cheek. Plus, it's a much better date. I would love to see that coin under magnification.
Great thread, guys!
Pillar of the Community
United States
7123 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2006  3:07 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Metalman to your friends list
not yet hadleydog

I was going to submit it to anacs before James left ,, now I will wait and see where the dust settles.

Rick
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1267 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2006  3:22 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add hadleydog to your friends list
quote:
Originally posted by Metalman

not yet hadleydog

I was going to submit it to anacs before James left ,, now I will wait and see where the dust settles.

Rick



I would love to be in the grading room when she went through.
Page 3 of 3   Previous TopicReplies: 31 / Views: 2,221Next Topic Page 3 of 3
First Page Previous Page  Showing last 15 replies.
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.


    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.34 seconds to rattle this change. Forums