| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,463 |
|
|
New Member
17 Posts |
Edited by djupsilon 11/06/2011 10:43 pm
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
AU-58 at worst but it seems like it might be around MS-63.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
A little wear, I'm thinking - the talons show a lot of detail while the chest doesn't, and the hair above the ear is in high relief but appears worn. I'd expect the talons and hair to be "flatter" were it a strike artifact. AU55.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
I agree, A well stuck lightly circulated Morgan. AU55. And by the way, 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1547 Posts |
I'm seeing a MS64 although admittedly with a distracting gash on the cheek I'm not too excited about. Really need pictures about that size and quality to be any more confident in a grade than that.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
5375 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 17 Posts |
I put up some new pics, from a camera this time. Keep the grades coming! :)
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Nice shots; they're overwhelming my cellphone.  Opinion unchanged.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1554 Posts |
MS63-64...Very nice luster and strike! The nicks on the face are too distracting for me to pay 64 prices though...Nice coin!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
168 Posts |
I would grade the reverse ms65 and the obverse ms63. Overall ms64. Nice coin!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
361 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
62 Posts |
Hey, Pictures are NOT CLEAR. But the coin looks uncirculated. Most likely MS62. Nice strike and decent luster for an 'o' minted coin. Too many deep marks on cheek to get a better grade in my opinion.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Just shy of MS due to some VERY light wear on cheek, hair, feathers. I will say AU-58.
Could certainly sneak its way into an MS-62 holder.
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,463 |
|