| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 2,581 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
4208 Posts |
I put in a low offer for this coin and was pleasantly surprised when I went to pay for an Augustus I just purchased that the offer was accepted. Can anyone tell me why this issue shouldnt be?  |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3446 Posts |
The emperor forgot to put on his trousers ?
Perhaps something more mundane ......
The standard in upper left of reverse
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United Kingdom
4208 Posts |
Nope, the standard is overwhelmingly correct. Instrumental to the issue, in fact. And he really does look like he forgot his trousers...
EDIT: Scratch that, only 1 really big issue. Looks like the mint was correct. The other issue is still silly paganism.
Edited by Ben
01/04/2014 4:59 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
3626 Posts |
Should he be wearing his pearl wotsit?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
4208 Posts |
Nope...you'll need to delve deeper into the issue than that.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
3626 Posts |
Is it a Chi-Rho on the standard?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
4208 Posts |
It is a Chi Rho on the standard. Try and work out what this coin shows and who it shows, it might help you.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
3626 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
4208 Posts |
Ill give a helpful hint...this coin's legends are the words God spoke to Constantine in his vision directly before the Battle of the Old Milvian Bridge (this is the point at which Christianity routed itself in Rome).
|
|
Valued Member
United States
324 Posts |
Is this the Gallus issue? The rarest of the three whose names this was issued under?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
4208 Posts |
Badger mint has got it - this is Constantius Gallus, the rarest emperor to be issued this type. But why should it not be?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
946 Posts |
Can't fathom whay the coin "should not be" as there is an example in Wild Winds.  http://wildwinds.com/coins/ric/cons...VIII_024.txtRated common, though I rarely see them for sale. Unless you are asking about why Constantius Gallus, who was never an Emperor but a Caesar, has the title " Dominus Noster"? Edited by Masis
01/04/2014 6:14 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
4208 Posts |
Ill give you a bigger hint...look up who issued this type and when.
And common it is not, which is why I was willing to pay £10 for this example.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
3626 Posts |
Wildwinds says it is common. Headache getting worse.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
946 Posts |
Ben's one is of Siscia, not the example I posted from Wild Winds, Sirmium. Here is what Warren states from his site on the Siscia type: " Constantius Gallus, for the advanced collector specialist in early Christian types.
AE2. 25-23 mm. 6:00.
HOC SIGNO VICTOR ERIS / ESIRM
This famous type was issued by Vetranio for himself, Constantius II, and Constantius Gallus.
The Gallus version is the rarest and hard to find in any shape.
As of this writing, vcoins has 11 HOC SIGNO pieces, 2 of Vetranio, 9 of Constantius II, and none are of Gallus.
RIC VIII Siscia 306." http://augustusmath.hypermart.net/tetrarchy.htmlScroll to about 3/4 of the way down to read and see the photo of the example stated. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
4208 Posts |
But could Vetranio have issued this for Constantius Gallus? Indeed, could Vetranio have issued any coins from Sirmium mint? Take a look at when Vetranio was in power, and where.
|
| |
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,581 |
Posted 01/04/2014 4:56 pm
