Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors 300,000 items to help build your collection! Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsCoin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes.








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1964 D Nickel RPM/Omm #3?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 16 / Views: 4,422Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
Newbie234's Avatar
United States
1386 Posts
 Posted 01/30/2018  10:24 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Newbie234 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I couldn't find a match for this coin either. The coin doesn't appear to have any MD.Any advice is greatly appreciated!
1964-D-Nickel-RPM/Omm-#3?
1964-D-Nickel-RPM/Omm-#3?
1964-D-Nickel-RPM/Omm-#3?
1964-D-Nickel-RPM/Omm-#3?
1964-D-Nickel-RPM/Omm-#3?
1964-D-Nickel-RPM/Omm-#3?
1964-D-Nickel-RPM/Omm-#3?
Pillar of the Community
CoinMasters's Avatar
United States
5964 Posts
 Posted 01/30/2018  12:13 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add CoinMasters to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Sorry but I think it is MD or wear. That's where it would show first because the mintmark is such high relief. jmo
Edited by CoinMasters
01/30/2018 12:17 pm
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 01/30/2018  12:29 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It is Machine Doubling. Note the affected area is all the same height on the mint mark. It is flat shelf like. If it was a RPM, then the devices would be raised, not lower than the mint mark.
1964-D-Nickel-RPM/Omm-#3?

If this were a legit item, it would have been called a RPM. (Re-Punched-Mintmark) That would designate it was a D/D punch. (which the OPs coin is not)
If it would be a OMM, then it would be a mint mark over another different mint mark. (Over-Mint-Mark) The example I posted above is a OMM. It is a Denver punch over a San Francisco mint mark punch. Note again that the punching would be raised above the field like the added punch mark. They would be raised and visible.
Pillar of the Community
Newbie234's Avatar
United States
1386 Posts
 Posted 01/30/2018  1:15 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Newbie234 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I can understand that. From what I have read that there are cases of OMM of the same MM such as a tilted or slanted mark. I don't believe this is one,But a double struck MM from the same mint is possible.
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 01/30/2018  1:26 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Actually the mint mark punch is used several times on the die to get the correct depth. It is the Miss alignment of the mint mark that causes the RPMs. Some RPM mint marks has several punches on them.
1964-D-Nickel-RPM/Omm-#3?
Pillar of the Community
Newbie234's Avatar
United States
1386 Posts
 Posted 01/30/2018  1:32 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Newbie234 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Ok I'm officially confused. So how does MD show up only on the MM, but not the rest of the coin? Then how can a MM be struck multiple times and not be considered a OMM or RPM? I'm just trying to figure this out.
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 01/30/2018  1:54 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It depends on how high/direction the die bounces. Sometimes mint marks are taller than other devices. We often see this on quarters that the mint mark is affected, when all the devices are around that area are not touched. Other times, with less bounce, the many of the devices are affected. So direction of the bounce and height make a difference. I would like the to see the area to the left on the building to see if that is affected by Machine Doubling. There is a an area just out of range that often shows contact on a vertical part of the building.
Rest in Peace
moxking's Avatar
United States
17900 Posts
 Posted 01/30/2018  5:54 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add moxking to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I can certainly understand your questions and your thought of it having an RPM.
Pillar of the Community
CoinMasters's Avatar
United States
5964 Posts
 Posted 01/31/2018  11:13 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add CoinMasters to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
it would show first because the mintmark is such high relief.

On the pre 1989 (hand punched) coins, the punches usually went into the dies deeper than the other devices. Being the highest device on the coin often made them the only device to exhibit Strike Doubling because of high die bounces.
What tipped me on your coin was the reduction of the size of the mint mark. On a RPM the last punch is generally not reduced.
If the "doubling" on a reduced device is flat and shelf like, it's Strike Doubling, otherwise it's die wear.
Pillar of the Community
Newbie234's Avatar
United States
1386 Posts
 Posted 01/31/2018  11:33 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Newbie234 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I do appreciate it all. Looks like I need to study MM's better!
New Member
Philippines
18 Posts
 Posted 06/09/2018  11:34 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add dostocalo14 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
sorry to use this topics for some question..its just cant post a new one with my account..so a friend of mine gave me this last night I'm not really sure if its in ms state and the sad thing is we dont have PCGS NGC or anacs here in the philippines..so can anyone of you can tell the grade of this coin according to the photos below?
1964-D-Nickel-RPM/Omm-#3?
1964-D-Nickel-RPM/Omm-#3?
1964-D-Nickel-RPM/Omm-#3?
Bedrock of the Community
Errers and Varietys's Avatar
United States
74919 Posts
 Posted 06/09/2018  11:41 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Errers and Varietys to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Dostocalo14, I'm not an expert at grading, but I'll give a good guess. I would say MS-63.
Errers and Varietys.
New Member
Philippines
18 Posts
 Posted 06/09/2018  11:56 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add dostocalo14 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
thats make sense..thank you man atleast I have an idea..thanks again
Bedrock of the Community
Errers and Varietys's Avatar
United States
74919 Posts
 Posted 06/10/2018  12:01 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Errers and Varietys to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
You're very welcome. That's an idea of what grade it could possibly be in. Other CCF members will chime in later and they'll probably give you their opinions on what this Nickel could grade at.
Errers and Varietys.
Edited by Errers and Varietys
06/10/2018 12:02 am
New Member
Philippines
18 Posts
 Posted 06/10/2018  01:03 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add dostocalo14 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
by the way does it looks like rpm?
1964-D-Nickel-RPM/Omm-#3?
Bedrock of the Community
Errers and Varietys's Avatar
United States
74919 Posts
 Posted 06/10/2018  01:10 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Errers and Varietys to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
To me, it doesn't look like an RPM.
Errers and Varietys.
  Previous TopicReplies: 16 / Views: 4,422Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.37 seconds to rattle this change. Forums