| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,385 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
473 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5318 Posts |
It is interesting. I can appreciate the guy's passion behind his writing. And some thoughts stood out, such as: Quote: The new coins we use in transactions are not real. They are wearing a mask, a disguise, one put on by the state. More absurdly, the state tells us not to look at the reality but rather to trust God that all is right with the money in the realm. Unfortunately, this has been the case during other periods in US history. Anyone curious can look up the term "not worth a Continental", or study the heated debates between bimetal/metric/gold standards in the late 1800s when serious monetary instability ensued due to gold/silver supply issues and efforts to peg money to actual metal values. It's complex, confusing reading, and those are simply a few things I remember.  It also bears saying that during our supposed "golden" past, there were pound and dollar notes with only implied, not intrinsic value. The point I took away: we need to have trust in our currency. Since money, checks, credit cards will always represent an abstraction; we need that abstraction backed by something we can trust. That means proper banking regulation. There was far too much profiteering from excessive credit liquidity in the past decades--and that's partly to blame for our current fiasco and dare I say: panic.  Well, enough of my blather, lol. Please correct or add to my incomplete thoughts. I had actually hoped the article was on "truth" as that applies to coin dealers and their wares. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2589 Posts |
theres no need to have trust in currency if its made out of gold, instant deflation!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5318 Posts |
Xavier, perhaps that's true.  However, how exactly does one "peg" the nominal value of a gold coin against market values which fluctuate as a rule? Would price fixing of spot metals work? Let's just say I'm skeptical.  For the sake of argument, let's say a circulating $10 gold coin is minted with Au at $1000/ounce. Just a year later, gold drops to $650 and bounces around that number for the next decade. Now, everyone's $10 gold coins they once trusted are now devalued because of market realities. The same mechanism which provided financial security is now their undoing. Do merchants now refuse $10 gold coins? On a scarier note--what happens to US Treasury balance sheets? And so on... In essence, this was one of the problems facing metals-backed currency in the late 1800s. Just something to consider; I won't be an instigator of another debate that has all been said before. It's a very complex subject I'm where I'm rather unqualified to speak in detail 
Edited by KurtS 08/17/2008 2:03 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
381 Posts |
In my opinion, If all currency was backed or made of gold and silver there would be no issue. There would be no inflation or deflation. If you had an ounce of gold back in the 1800's you could buy a suit and belt with boots. That same ounce today will buy you a suit and belt with boots. However in dollars this is not the case. Exchange rates would have no effect on your money. What has happened is we have Split into two currencies. Against our forefathers, constitution and the bible to have every coin made of Gold and silver.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
130 Posts |
I agree with jeffreyice1.
We need to return to honest money.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6326 Posts |
Quote: If you had an ounce of gold back in the 1800's you could buy a suit and belt with boots. That same ounce today will buy you a suit and belt with boots. Don't agree with that......"back then" you could buy a heck of a lot more than a suit and a pair of boots with an ounce of gold ! You could buy a horse, a firearm, a month's worth of supplies, a gold pocket watch, lanterns, oil, some land, and probably even a mail order bride !!...as well as a "suit and a pair of boots".....and still have money left over to put in a bank ! Wish I could buy a $15.00 horse nowadays !!.........ahhhhhh.....the early 1800's.......if we could only go back !
Edited by eaglefoot 08/17/2008 5:06 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
381 Posts |
In 1800 it cost 18.50 a week to live for a family. Gold Prices were 19.3939 as of 12/31/1800.
Today it cost 800.00 a week for a family to live. Gold Prices were 914.00 as of 1/14/2008.
Ask me if I would want to hold on to $19.39 in currency or that 1 ounce of gold for 200 years. (Except for the collectible value).
1800's Geldings between $30 and $50, a mare between $40 and $60 because she could be bred and the foal could be sold as profit later.
So about two ounces of gold.
Edited by jeffreyice1 08/17/2008 7:32 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4541 Posts |
Quote: Wish I could buy a $15.00 horse nowadays !.........ahhhhhh.....the early 1800's.......if we could only go back ! I think that is a good deal but in those times 15 dollars was a lot of money. Not everyone was dropping 15 dollars on a horse everyday. If you could take what you have and live back then "you know convert all your money you have now to morgans or other currency" then yes I say go back. But if you dont have the money to buy a horse now I am sure you wouldnt have the money to buy a horse then.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
164 Posts |
One of the reasons that backing currency with gold worked was that the gov't guaranteed the price of gold. Before 1933, gold was set at $20.67 an ounce. Gold could not fluctuate in price because people wanting to buy gold knew that they could buy all they wanted from the US Gov't at that price. I could not tell you that my ounce of gold was worth 100 dollars because you would know that you could pay only 20.67 for that ounce.
The dollar was devalued in 1933 when gold was revalued to 35.00. That value was maintained until market conditions forced the gov't to let the dollar float and did not control the price of gold.
Obviously you can only guarantee the price of gold if you have a lot of gold. And for many years, the United States did have a lot of gold.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
381 Posts |
True it was fixed from 1879 to 1933. Before 1879 it did fluctuate just not a lot. At the end of 1864 (Its peek) it was 57.052 an ounce.
Edited by jeffreyice1 08/18/2008 06:11 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6326 Posts |
Quote: In 1800 it cost 18.50 a week to live for a family. Gold Prices were 19.3939 as of 12/31/1800. Today it cost 800.00 a week for a family to live. Gold Prices were 914.00 as of 1/14/2008 Jeffrey.....I guess that depends on where you lived or live !.... BOTH of your analogies seem exhorbantly expensively waaaaayy too high. Here's an excerpt from an Arkansas paper in 1839... Quote: 03/27/1839 Ten Dollars Reward Strayed or Stolen from the subscriber about the 26th of February last, a DARK BROWN HORSE, with a white spot in his forehead, 15 hands high, about 6 years old. The above reward will be paid for his delivery to me.
JOSEPH CASTLIN Little Rock, March 24, 1839 I realize this isn't the price of the horse, only the reward for returning one if found.... But, I can't believe these "facts and figures" would apply to, say 1812, the same as 1856, and the same in 1889. Meaning several differnent generations of families would have seen "drastic" price changes on Horses, dry goods, etc. etc. just from 1812 to 1889 for example. The Price "for a family to live" would change A LOT every 15 years or so..... and that would also depend on where they lived....some places are MUCH more expensive with "goods" and "stock" than other places were. ...... "pennies will get you pounds" of stuff !coffee, flour, bacon, cookware (not China, but simple cheap), tobacco, nails, milled wood, etc. etc. etc.
Edited by eaglefoot 08/18/2008 09:03 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
628 Posts |
All very interesting, and very complex. Great topic.
IMO "fiat" money is OK, serves the purpose.
I like the use of a fictional coin shop in the article, though we all know coin shops accept fiat money for their morgans and IHCs.
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,385 |
|