Coin Community Family of Web Sites
Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!300,000 items to help build your collection! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Shop CCF Members on eBay! Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Commems Collection Classic: What If? 1937 Benjamin Logan Sesquicentennial

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 864Next Topic  
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
Learn More...
commems's Avatar
United States
12251 Posts
 Posted 04/04/2022  5:49 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add commems to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
In early 1937, companion bills were introduced in the House and Senate that called for "50-cent pieces in commemoration of the sesquicentennial anniversary of the expedition of General Benjamin Logan into that territory now known as Logan County. Ohio, and the destruction of the last great Indian stronghold in Ohio." (If introduced today, I believe the bill's language would be quite a bit different to make it more politically-aware.)

The House bill was introduced in January by Representative Arthur William Aleshire (D-OH) and referred to the House Committee on Coinage, Weights, and Measures. The Senate bill followed in April and was introduced by Senator Robert Johns Bulkley (D-OH); the bill was referred to the Senate Committee on Banking and Currency.

General Benjamin Logan
Commems-Collection-Classic:-What-If?-1937-Benjamin-Logan-Sesquicentennial
(Image Credit: Cincinnati Museum Center at Union Terminal. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.)


Benjamin Logan was born in Augusta County, Virginia in 1743. In his adult life, he helped to settle Kentucky (originally an area belonging to Virginia), advocated for Kentucky's statehood and served in various government positions. Logan served in the Virginia House of Delegates (1781-82; 1785-87), attended Kentucky's Constitutional Convention in 1792 and later served as a member of Kentucky's House of Representatives (1792-1795).

The coin was meant to pay homage to Logan's military service, however, rather than his political career. As part of the Virginia militia, prior to the American Revolution, Logan took part in multiple campaigns against Native Americans who were in conflict with the growing number of European settlers encroaching upon their hunting lands. After the American Revolution, in 1786, Logan led a militia group from Kentucky on a raid north of the Ohio River (into present-day Ohio) to put down members of the Shawnee Nation who had been launching attacks against settlers in Kentucky. Most of the Native American villages Logan and his men encountered were poorly defended as the warriors from each were largely off to support a looming battle in another area. Unfortunately, many women, children and elderly were either killed or taken prisoner, and 13 villages were burned to the ground during the raid.

Though they set out with the intention of putting an end to the Native American unrest and attacks on settlers, the actions of Logan and his men actually incited the Shawnee and led to the escalation of the Northwest Indian War.

The bills called for a single Mint facility to strike 25,000 half dollars of standard specifications and for them to be delivered to the Logan County Commemorative Coin Association in a single batch. All of the coins were to be "dated" 1937, regardless of when struck, and were to be issued within one year of the bill's enactment. The bill's language ensured that it was to be a collector-friendly issue that followed the Senate Committee's established guidelines. (See link below.)

Neither bill was reported out of Committee nor considered by either chamber as a whole - possibly due to the somewhat local nature of the event to be commemorated vs. one of national significance. Ultimately, there would be no 1937 Benjamin Logan half dollar (or privately-struck Logan commemorative medal). If the bill had moved forward and gained approval, it would have been another after-the-fact coin as the 150th anniversary of Logan's raids was in 1936 not 1937. (Makes me wonder if the dual date "1786-1936" would have found its way into the coin's design.)


For more about the Senate Committee's commemorative coin provisions, see:

- Quick Bits #44 - Committee On Banking And Currency


For other of my posts about commemorative coins and medals, check out: Commems Collection



Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
Bedrock of the Community
Coinfrog's Avatar
United States
94367 Posts
 Posted 04/04/2022  6:01 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Coinfrog to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Doesn't sound like a guy who deserves much applause.
Moderator
Learn More...
nickelsearcher's Avatar
United States
15386 Posts
 Posted 04/05/2022  05:45 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nickelsearcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
The bill's language ensured that it was to be a collector-friendly issue that followed the Senate Committee's established guidelines.


And thank goodness for the Senate having the wisdom to limit the abuses on many of the proposed issues from this era, although I say they came to their sensible restrictions a few years too late.


Quote:
Doesn't sound like a guy who deserves much applause.


Agreed frog, although in 1786 these actions were viewed by the European settlers as righteous nation building.
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187579 Posts
 Posted 04/05/2022  09:31 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Probably a good thing this one never made it out of either committee.
  Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 864Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.33 seconds to rattle this change. Forums