| Author |
Replies: 17 / Views: 3,121 |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
As I have stated many times my grading skills lack alot to be desired so I figured I would see what everyone else gave this coin. I do not need it attributed because I know its a VAM-79 which is one of the HOT-50 coins. What I need to know is what you guys think it would grade with a TPG 
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
2684 Posts |
Bryan, because I like you, you're such a nice guy, and you're a brother MorganFreak, I'm gonna go easy on you and give the Morgan an MS-65. Except for the smudges on Liberty's cheek which I attribute to lighting (you're using a regular light bulb, aren't you? I'll be buying a blue light tomorrow on my trip to "town" [Phoenix]), I don't see anything distracting at all except for what might be some tiny bag marks in the fields, rims are OK, luster looks good, even under the yellow light. The Eagle's breast looks a little flat which is typical for the year and it looks like there might be a tiny ping in its lower right breast, but otherwise it appears to be a nice MS piece. As far as what a TPG might give it, don't send it to PCGS. It appears they are having a major offensive on Morgans (see my thread "1890CC Morgan" and "1891CC Morgan" which will be updated this evening). Despite all my PCGS Morgans with which I can compare, I can no longer accurately project what PCGS might give a Morgan except it will grade lower or much lower than what they might have graded it one to five years ago; they might even send this one back as circulated if they maintain their current path. Go with NGC or (preferably) ANACS. At least with ANACS, you'd get an honest opinion. Gud luk! Fred
Edited by Morgan Fred 03/28/2006 11:09 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
14454 Posts |
Yes I use a regular lamp, and I was going to send it to NGC just because this is a major peice of my B1 reverse set on collectors society  and they dont allow ANACS as of yet
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
14454 Posts |
Well This just got finalized at NGC and it is on its way back home in a new MS-63 slab which put me in the #1 slot for B1 Reverse Morgans here is the link to the current #1 slot at Collectors Society(NGC) http://www.collectors-society.com/r...eSetID=19238The VAM-81 is the only one that has eluded my capture as of now
Edited by Bryan1315 05/24/2006 3:34 pm
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
2684 Posts |
Way to go, Bryan! Too bad NGC wouldn't listen to me, but MS-63 is plenty good enough. Congrats on the #1 spot on B-1 Reverse Morgans! (I don't belong to the Collector's Society, so wasn't able to log into the site although I noted it has a free log-in capability.)
BTW, is the "B" in B-1 for Milton Bolender who described early dollar varieties? Or is this another "B"?
Fred
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
I think they were unkind to you by at least a point on the grade.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
2684 Posts |
I'm not so sure, Dave. My sample size of NGC graded Morgans is small, but if they're following PCGS's current trend toward being harsher on Morgan grades than they were in the past, then I'd be real happy with a -63!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
14454 Posts |
you know I am unsure what the "B" in B1 represents but I would imagine since Milton Bolender did describe the early varieties and this is the same reverse as the 8TF has but its a 7Tf variety (has the long nock on the arrow) then that is what it stands for
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
14454 Posts |
I would have loved to see a MS-64 come back because it would be the only MS-64 of this type graded by NGC, now its tied for Top Pop with 2 other MS-63's
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
2684 Posts |
Bryan, getting MS-64 Morgans out of any of the top TPGs these days is about as common as getting MS-68s from the same TPGs. Case in point: about 18 months ago, a dealer friend of mine who knew I collected Morgans had a raw 1892CC Morgan he had just taken in. He's no grading slouch, thought it would grade at least MS-64 or even MS-65, sent me quality pics. I compared it with other PCGS MS-64s and -65s and agreed with him, so bought it from him at a favorable MS-63 price. I submitted it to PCGS just KNOWING it would come back at least MS-64 and was quite hopeful for MS-65. Sho' 'nuff, it came back MS-63. Over the past two plus years, I've submitted a number of Morgans, both raw and crossovers (mostly NGC) to PCGS that were absolutely at least MS-64 by any standard; sho' 'nuff again, MS-63. I think the "4" on their label maker is broken.  NGC seems to be following the PCGS trend on Morgan grades. Brutal, but at least they aren't body-bagging them (with one exception, but that's another story).
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
14454 Posts |
Oh I would have been heart broken if this thing came back in a little flip casket with a pink slip (head stone) attached to it. I think NGC broke a record with this coin, I sent it on and it arrived there on the 17th and they are finished grading and have already shipped it back today, that is 7 calander work days I was very impressed on the time it took them
Edited by Bryan1315 05/24/2006 10:01 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
14454 Posts |
Oh yeah I had a buddy that has been a member of PCGS for years send in the 1891 to PCGS so when it gets back I will show pictures of it either body bagged or slabbed
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
14454 Posts |
I did a little reading about the reverse thing and here is what I came up with The initial reverse (the A reverse) was the 8TF, the second working hub (the A2 reverse)had a hooked eagles beak and the "I" in "IN" was away from the eagles wing, The second reverse (the B reverse) was used on some P minted coins from April 4, 1878 to atleast June 28 1878 the number of feathers was changed to seven and the "A" in "AMERICA" touched the eagles wing, An early version of this design (the B1 reverse)had a long center arrow shaft which appeared on some 1878-P,S, and CC minted coins, the later version of the design (the B2 reverse) used a short center arrow shaft. A few of the dies of the first design (the A reverse) were re-impressed with the second design working hub (the B1 reverse) on March 26 1878 and this resulted in the seven over eight tail feather design variety
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
2684 Posts |
Quote: Originally posted by Bryan1315
Oh yeah I had a buddy that has been a member of PCGS for years send in the 1891 to PCGS so when it gets back I will show pictures of it either body bagged or slabbed
That was my gripe with PCGS: they body-bagged an NGC MS-62 1890CC and wouldn't back down, even after a Presidential Review. Said it had been "harshly cleaned". I've been looking at Morgans for over half a century and this one shows absolutely no signs of cleaning. Under high magnification (~25X), it even shows a die crack, something that would have been eliminated by any surface alteration (i.e., harsh cleaning). When my PCGS Collector's Club membership runs out in September, I won't renew.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
14454 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
2684 Posts |
Quote:Originally posted by Bryan1315Just figured I would see if you could click this link to see the coins in the Gallery http://www.collectors-society.com/r...&Tab=gallery since you said you couldnt click the other link because you werent a member This one opened for me. What a gorgeous set, Bryan! I can see why you're so proud of it! Actually, the other URL also opened for me. What happened was the login section opened and just sat there for awhile. If I had waited long enough, the whole page would have downloaded. I guess my next question would be: where are you gonna find a VAM-81 to fill in the empty hole? I wouldn't even begin to know how to search for a VAM-81 unless the auction houses list them from time to time. Fred
|
| |
Replies: 17 / Views: 3,121 |