| Author |
 Replies: 13 / Views: 1,723 |
|
|
New Member
United States
23 Posts |
I found this while roll searching today.  |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1042 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
476 Posts |
That's VERY fun. I like that...definitely a keeper.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2600 Posts |
Definitely a Grease Filled Die. I think you can see some additional evidence of it in the weakness of the UST in TRUST. I have seen these go for a couple of bucks on ebay. Jim |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
952 Posts |
that is a neat coin. I wonder what the value is? You would think it would be worth quite a bit.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
920 Posts |
I've never seen that before. I also would think it's got to be worth quite a bit.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19931 Posts |
That's a nice Greaser! Can you see any trace of the last digit? As Jim said, it's worth a couple bucks on ebay. Lincoln Cent Lover!VERDI-CARE™ INVENTOR https://verdi.care/
|
|
New Member
 United States
23 Posts |
I can't see any trace of the last digit with an 8x loupe. I will add this to my keepers.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
77 Posts |
What makes you say it's a 72?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4846 Posts |
looks more like a 1971 D to me
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2189 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1418 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
The smaller thinner letters were used for the motto ONLY between 1969 and 1972. This coin obviously isn't a 1969. That leaves 1970-1972.
The shape and size of the 7 in the date is wrong for 1970 or 1971. That leaves 1972 as the only possible answer.
If you look at the motto closely, there's a decent likelihood of finding the master die doubling that happened in 1972 that would seal the statement that it is indeed from 1972.
For many reason it cannot possibly be a 1978, including all the above reasons coupled with the fact that the mintmark changed in 1974/1975. The mintmark on this coin is not the right size or shape for 1978.
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,723 |
|
Posted 01/27/2010 09:18 am
