| Author |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,277 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
93 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3229 Posts |
I am going with MS65. I will also say 5 FS. Very nice Jefferson! Thanks for sharing!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
917 Posts |
 Nice find!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4778 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
93 Posts |
Thanks all... I am curious about what you see that makes this Jefferson a lower grade. Do the planchet / die marks on the lower jaw detract from the grade? Just curious as the fields look so clean etc.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
355 Posts |
I gave this one an MS65, that is a *nice* Jefferson. Good pics too.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4132 Posts |
I dunno, I see no reason why this one shouldn't be a MS66.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
93 Posts |
@phankins11... Thanks, yes I know MS65 is nice... :) This one really is beautiful in hand and under mag though. I guess what I was wondering is if there was anything in particular that was holding this back from a yet higher grade, such as obverse strike or anything else that I am looking past.
Jeffersons are sometimes tough for me as there are years where everything is beaten yet some examples grade high for some reason. If you take PCGS images at coinfacts as an example, you will find specimens from some years that look abused and are graded say MS67. (usually with toning) I guess those are "market graded"?
Still... This one struck me immediately for it's subtle tone, huge luster and apparent nick free state... not to mention the step detail. I don't see this Jefferson as one worth slabbing / graded but it is one I will pull out from time to time to get lost in with my loupe.
Thanks all..
|
|
Valued Member
United States
355 Posts |
dgleich, keep in mind I'm new, and I, for some reason, seem to always grade lower than most, I dunno why but I do. still learning...its a nice jeffy for sure.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
93 Posts |
Yes, well no one stops learning regardless. I think Jefferson's are very much under appreciated. So many are weakly struck, struck with worn dies, have the lack of step detail and look so beaten that a "clean" and nicely struck example really turns your head. I don't find grading Jefferson's very easy or straightforward as compared to Washingtons for example.
I am pretty new again as well... after a 30 year break!
|
| |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,277 |
|