It is a nicely sized struck-through error, rather unusual for a coin from a Mint Set. BTW, I love that original Mint Set toning
The Mint was not too fond of returns back then, they even included a note stating as much-
Please do not ask us to make exchanges or adjustments.
If there should appear- what may seem to you- a defect or scratch on a coin- it is, no doubt, a crease in the packaging material. We tell you this to save us both unnecessary correspondence.
http://i607.photobucket.com/albums/...DSCN9907.jpg
And to think that people complain about the Mint so much nowadays, they really had an arrogant attitude about things back in the day when there was only a mailing address and no phone or website.
Quote:
Whoever got it in 1958 should have sent it back for replacement.
Whoever got it in 1958 should have sent it back for replacement.
The Mint was not too fond of returns back then, they even included a note stating as much-
Please do not ask us to make exchanges or adjustments.
If there should appear- what may seem to you- a defect or scratch on a coin- it is, no doubt, a crease in the packaging material. We tell you this to save us both unnecessary correspondence.
http://i607.photobucket.com/albums/...DSCN9907.jpg
And to think that people complain about the Mint so much nowadays, they really had an arrogant attitude about things back in the day when there was only a mailing address and no phone or website.






















