What Do You Make Of This Listing? - Coin Community Forum

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Author	Replies: 7 / Views: 1,378
NYBrian84 Valued Member United States 279 Posts	Posted 05/22/2012 01:14 am I came across this listing, and I'm not sure what to make of it. I know I wouldn't buy from him, would anyone else feel comfortable? It is extremely odd to say the least. It could just be me, but it seems like this guy sets himself up so the buyer will never have a chance to get a refund even if the seller is in the wrong. http://www.ebay.com/itm/1092-DATELE..._1271wt_1185 Report this Post to the Staff

rycolemet Valued Member United States 238 Posts	Posted 05/22/2012 06:44 am doesn't look like he has sold anything in the last 6 months and has a feedback score under 90. I wouldn't buy anything from them personally. Report this Post to the Staff
SsuperDdave Moderator United States 23522 Posts	Posted 05/22/2012 08:00 am Yeah, anybody who achieves 2500 feedbacks with a favorable percentage under 90 isn't getting my money. Report this Post to the Staff
Peter THOMAS Pillar of the Community Australia 2830 Posts	Posted 05/22/2012 08:09 am that's a strange business-model. Report this Post to the Staff
Bluntedbobylon Valued Member United States 247 Posts	Posted 05/22/2012 10:05 am He keeps responding to feedback that the buyer didn't pay for their PayPal processing fees....? So if I won an item for $100 with $3 S/H he expects additional funds to cover what he would be charged through PayPal? Does eBays rules allow sellers to tack on additional fees above and beyond the winning total? Report this Post to the Staff
fioti Pillar of the Community United States 4212 Posts	Posted 05/22/2012 11:57 am That under 90% is just what's been left. Also, he's had issues with PP that wants him to buck the system all to heck. Me thinks he protests too loud. Report this Post to the Staff
basebal21 Bedrock of the Community 13014 Posts	Posted 05/23/2012 7:14 pm Quote: He keeps responding to feedback that the buyer didn't pay for their PayPal processing fees....? So if I won an item for $100 with $3 S/H he expects additional funds to cover what he would be charged through PayPal? Does eBays rules allow sellers to tack on additional fees above and beyond the winning total? I highly doubt they allow their fees to be covered by the buyer. If that was the case they would have a buyer fee not seller fee. Items are assumed to have that built into the price. I do love how he blames ebay for not allowing returns and says paypal paymets cant be refunded despite the thousands of users daily that list items with returns and all paypal requiring is about 3 clicks to issue a refund Report this Post to the Staff
cwb1877 Pillar of the Community United States 1659 Posts	Posted 05/23/2012 7:59 pm Quote: Does eBays rules allow sellers to tack on additional fees above and beyond the winning total? No. Here is ebay's payment surcharges policy: http://pages.ebay.com/help/policies...charges.html Report this Post to the Staff
	Replies: 7 / Views: 1,378

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

All Forums Category: eCommerce and Online Auction Forums Forum: eCommerce | eBay, eCrater, Heritage, Paypal, Auction Houses, etc.

The First Dollar, your premier source for bullion and rare coins. See our bullion list on the site and the coin inventory on ebay.

Silver Gold Bull US is the United States leading bullion dealer. We deliver gold coins, gold bars, silver coins, silver bars and precious metals to your door. Order today!

View Last 100 New Topics

View Last 100 Active Topics

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum

It took 0.23 seconds to rattle this change.