| Author |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,280 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
438 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7195 Posts |
They are nice Franklins, proof 69 probably not, more likely a 65 or 66. Still great coins to have and admire.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
438 Posts |
65 or 66 even though they are flawless surfaces through my 10x loupe?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7195 Posts |
I am not the best grader, I tend to collect more on eye appeal. You may have a mark free or "flawless surface" but the strike quality can make the difference in grade quality. The more a die pair is used the less detail it will transfer to the finished product hence the mint states from 60 to 70 for uncirculated coins.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
438 Posts |
makes sense. still learning a lot about grading :)
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
PR69 on a 1959 Franklin would be very unusual. 67s are common and 68s are readily available also. My guess would be PR68 if you can't see any flaws. As noted above: strike, luster, and eye appeal are paramount when grading at that level.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3184 Posts |
Send it in and lets see. I will guess 67s
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
Seems to be absolutely unmarked to me!
The detail on the top half of Franklin's head seems to be lacking a bit. Slightly worn dies, slightly weaker strike, or perhaps the dies were slightly over polished?
I was looking at the detail only. I do not consider that I know enough enough to grade PF66 to 70.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
173 Posts |
I'd say they'd average out around 67. Nice proofs.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
305 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,280 |
|