| Author |
Replies: 50 / Views: 16,766 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3789 Posts |
And again I state-
1- Jacob who took my order was not going to tell me there was a surcharge for using a credit card only after I asked him why my total bill was larger than the amount I had planned on going off THEIR Ad.
2- A honorable business places all inclusions, exclusions and fees in the fine print. It is bait and switch to offer one price in an Ad and then when the consumer calls to place the order, add the surcharge without informing them.
3- Westminster Mint has many complaints similar to mine on the Better Business Bureau web site, simply input Westminster Mint on google or the BBB web site and you will see complaints regarding Westminster Mint and also see Ripoff Report on the Internet.
4- My complaint is not over being refused service or the placement of the order. The issue is Westminster Mint must plainly state in its Ad its terms and not assume that everyone expects to be charged a surcharge.
|
|
New Member
United States
11 Posts |
 The company took time to make their position clear. I think you are being ridiculous. All this over $6.00!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1227 Posts |
Mr. Clay, I'm sorry, but to me this sounds like a pile of you-know-what. Even on television ads you'll hear the fast-talking advertisement announcer say "some additional charges/restrictions may apply" so you know that when you call in, you may get those extra fees or blips on the radar. It's an advertising standard.
Even if it's not legally required, basic courtesy would seem to say that you should include it. Have you considered, for example, that an older purchaser who does not often use a credit card may not know such a fee exists? If my grandmother was the one answering your ad, you'd catch her completely blindside--and she is not a rich woman to whom six dollars is chump change. She's also not a stupid woman--just a woman who for most of her life used only cash, and got her first credit card in her seventies so she could rent a car. Your practice is unfair to people who may be new to using credit cards, and also to people who are new to bullion purchases. Shady hidden fees--and like it or not, that is precisely what this is--only turn people off to the hobby.
It wouldn't kill you to include a small line, "additional fees for credit may apply" or "a $1 surcharge will be added for credit orders." If it would, perhaps you should reconsider that basic idea I mentioned above: COURTESY. It isn't necessary to mention this fee. It's also not necessary to hold the door for a person with their arms full of packages. But in both cases, if you don't do it, you come out looking like a jerk.
Just something to consider.
|
|
New Member
United States
11 Posts |
Its an advert not a contract. Like they say the have advertised since 2001 without a complaint about c/c fees. Should they also post due to possible hurricane the size of Sandy or future terrorist attack like 911 your order may be delayed? Where does their need for courtesy end? To use my boat and fishing business people must sign a waiver and wear a life jacket. Everyone knows this and I don't post it. What if some senior comes along without her reading glasses and can't read the waiver? What if she weighs 300 lbs and the vest don't fit? These bullion dealers work on tiny margins. We should only call them out when harm has been done or they mess up. Merry Christmas everyone
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
271 Posts |
I don't want to start an argument, but I just have to state what I'm feeling right now.
I think that, IF the Westminster Mint tried to charge more than the advertised price, that is wrong. HOWEVER, I find it extremely unlikely that there was not some fine print in the ad. If they did this often, without warning, they would not last long. Nearly every ad, including coins, has fine print of some kind, and it can be easy to miss. But I'm sure it was there.
Also, I get that it's not the money, it's the principle, but it really doesn't seem that way here. If the OP was upset about the extra charge, he could have complained to the Westminster Mint and to the BBB. But it really seems like the $6 is the issue here.
And finally, the Westminster Mint doesn't seem like a shady operation. Just the fact that they actually bothered to post here and try to resolve the situation tells me that they care about their customers and their reputation. The Westminster President's post could have been pure lies, but it says something good about a company when they really try to resolve a situation.
Merry Christmas everybody!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3789 Posts |
Well, I have a copy of the Ad and if anyone wants to see it, I can certainly put it up. Nowhere does the Ad state that there is a surcharge for using a credit card.
As I have stated before, if Westminster Mint stated in the Ad that there is a surcharge for using a credit card, I would have had no problem.
But to lead me on, to think that was the price per coin and shipping, were the only charges, I feel I was baited and switched.
I dont think ANYONE here would like receive and respond to an Ad, to go to the store, look at an item, conclude its a reasonable offer, go to purchase, and then be told, "oh theres a surcharge btw". Thats not being honest.
Westminster Mint can charge all they want and whatever extra fees, that's not my issue. my issue is I was led to believe what the Ad stated on the per price per coin and shipping fees was all I needed to pay.
Again, I Have a copy of the Ad, I have a copy of several of their Ads from USA TOday, NONE of them discuss a credit card surcharge.
Google Westminster Mint and look them up at the BBB you can clearly read the complaints against them, my case is not isolated.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
408 Posts |
Get over it man. Life ain't always fair. Move on. Merry Christmas and Happy New year!!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1116 Posts |
Many times when I pull out the plastic I'm asked if its credit or debit. If I say debit they say fine no problem. If I say credit, they tell about the added fee. At that point it's up to me to either agree or disagree. Agree fine - Disagree no sale end of story. There's nothing shady about telling you up front that there is a fee for using a credit card. You have the last word if you want to make the purchase or not. You agreed to the terms of the sale. End of the story. If you have a credit card you are an adult. You could have canceled the sale with no hassle. I've done it many a time if I didn't like the terms or the person I was doing business with. I don't complain publicly about a deal that I knew all the facts about after the fact. To do so is just not right. Like the man said said: Quote: Get over it man. Life ain't always fair. Move on. Merry Christmas and Happy New year!!
Edited by ghostrider 12/25/2012 10:13 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3789 Posts |
Again this is about being truthful in advertising.
No honorable business Advertises their product without putting some sort of fine print with inclusions, exclusions and surcharges.
If you are going to charge extra for using a credit card it should be plainly stated.
If everyone else wants to be an ignorant consumer thats fine by me but I am not going to pay a dime more than what the Advertised price is... period lol :D
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3789 Posts |
ghostrider-
Clearly you did not read what I posted. I didn't accept the charge. Had I not asked about the price difference, Jacob would have charged my credit card without telling me about the surcharge for using credit cards, and ima glad I did my math when he read me back the math because he was going to slip in the surcharge without asking me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1227 Posts |
Bullion Billy, I say the need for courtesy ends at what I would call "full effort." An example unrelated would be an old lady needing to cross the street, carrying a package and using a cane. You say, "Ma'am, may I help you across?" She says "yes," and you do it; or, she says "no thank you," and you say "all right; we're crossing at the same light, so let me know if you change your mind." You have done your due diligence; the lady knows she has an arm if she needs one, and that if she doesn't change her mind but stumbles in the crosswalk, you'll help her.
So, I would say it is part of the company's due diligence to report "additional fees may apply." You don't have to spell out what they are; once the customer knows they're there, it's the customer's duty to say "By the way, the ad said 'additional fees may apply'--what does that mean?" so the seller can say "we charge a fee for credit to cover our overhead" or "if you ask for faster shipping, the rate charged will increase" or what have you. But you can't ask about something you don't know is there.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
2087 Posts |
I dislike credit cards.....I actually think business's should be allowed to tack the costs of a transaction on to a CC purchase. Why should the CC transaction costs be spread across every customer? IMHO User pays should rule. I believe Credit card companies, when they first set up banned( in their contracts) the adding of a surcharge so as to ensure they gained market traction far more easily. These days I think consumer law should be modified to be far more free market oriented and those provisions in the credit card contracts should be deemed illegal.
|
|
New Member
United States
11 Posts |
This is not a discussion about credit card fees or senior citizens.Someone started this thread and dissed Westminster Mint. They also posted on scam report and wrote to the BBB. It seems like a lot of hype and trouble to go to since the company did nothing wrong and the customer is not out of pocket! What is he warning us about? He talks about bait and switch. In bait and switch scams the company tries to sell you something they make a big profit on. Westminster Mint does not make money on credit card fees VISA do.
Going fishing.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1227 Posts |
Billy, you seem to have taken my analogy literally, in which case it becomes useless. Bait and switch may not be the correct term, but this is certainly dishonest.
Also, I did as OP suggested and ran WMM through friend Google. Guess what I found? The president of the company apparently makes a habit of searching for complaints against the company on other forums and posting, rather rudely, about the person's response--and suggesting they shouldn't discuss it.
Hm. If he has time to do that, he has time to write better ad copy.
They also seem to chalk up an average of 1.2 complaints per month over the last three years on the BBB website. Not good for a relatively small company. Google offers three related searches: "westminster mint scam" "westminster mint ripoff" "is westminster mint legit" three out of eight? Also not good.
Ripoff Report shows eight more complaints, along with more rude rebuttals from the president. To this I will add a statistic I learned when I trained for my job: only ONE PERCENT of people who feel they have been treated wrongly by a company will actually complain and give them the chance to make it right. The rest will quietly go elsewhere. And making a BBB report isn't easy; I've helped my mom do it. If FIFTY PEOPLE felt it was important enough to complain about, how many were actually ripped off?
On the whole, I'd say unprofessional at best.
Edited by ninamason 12/26/2012 08:14 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2130 Posts |
I have been following this thread since it started. IMO the OP is correct. I believe because they were going to charge him/her without even mentioning the fees. They could of mentioned the extra fees as soon as the OP said he/she would be using a cc. At the very least the WMM should change their add & this would save them the hassle of complaints the BBB & other reporting agencies. Not to mention their reputation. If the WMM does care about their reputation & customer satisfaction, then they should rewrite their add. I would like to hear more from the WMM pres. on the above mentioned complaints.
Edited by chris12018 12/26/2012 09:22 am
|
| |
Replies: 50 / Views: 16,766 |