Broadstrike Or Double Strike ~ [you Decide]

Of the many broadstruck dimes in my inventory/collection, a few displayed full reeded edges, along with one quarter.

Way back when, I was the high bidder on one of Fred Weinbergs ebay auctions. The item description was a 2004d double struck dime, the first strike was struck in-collar, and 2nd strike out of collar (broadstruck). This purchase was confirmation that what I had was also double strikes as the broadstruck displayed full edge reeding.

[i should also note the ANACS certification was almost double what was paid for the coin]

However, ANACS did not agree and designated it a broadstruck only. I telephones ANACS after receiving the coin and mentioned that it should have been a double strike due to it's full edge reeding. They disagreed and the grader mentioned that the edge must be counting machine damage, I then asked "If it is machine damage, how come it's not in a problem holder", in which they replied to re-submit the coin so they can change the holder (I don't think so).

I had a friendly email conversation with Fred on the ANACS results and Fred mentioned that he knows what counting machine damage looks like, and that IS NOT counting machine damage.

Anyway, below is the ANACS coin I purchased raw from Fred (it's hard to view the edge reeding in the holder), along with a raw 2002d dime and 1984 off center quarter that also displayed full edge reeding.

On the raw coins I placed them against a mirror to show the reeding in the photos...

I still think Fred Weinberg is correct, not ANACS, and will now let the CCF members debate who is correct, and why you had come to that conclusion...

Thanks for viewing and look forward to the replies.
I stated my opinion above and now it's time for yours.