| Author |
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,062 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
2624 Posts |
I have said before that Roman coins don't excite me as much as the Greek ones but not wanting to neglect that side of things I made a particular effort to find a couple of attractive coins. The first is pretty standard, I wanted to add a campgate and chose Constantine II Siscia mint (purely on the basis that it looked a well preserved coin)  My second coin I have been looking at for a while, I didn't want to pay so much money but I wanted a Denarius of Marcus Aurelius. Many that I saw the detail/flan/legends werent up to standard... this one is no exception (the legend on the right of the obverse is a tad weak) but it makes up for that with its attractive toning. 
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23731 Posts |
Two very nicely detailed coins.
Edited by echizento 01/08/2013 11:04 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Bulgaria
843 Posts |
Love this rainbow patina 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3229 Posts |
Great Constantine II with left facing bust. Really nice detail, well centered, and great legends!  The Marcus Aurelius is also really sharp and I also like the toning!:)I have a Severus Alexander with similar toning:)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4253 Posts |
Very nice on both coins. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36826 Posts |
Both great coins, nice find!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5155 Posts |
I love the toning wow, awesome find!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
946 Posts |
Really nice toning on the denarius of Marcus Aurelius.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1411 Posts |
 Great toning and Great Details!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2044 Posts |
Congratulations on the two new Romans. Very nice!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4966 Posts |
wow, both great....but the color on that second coin is amazing. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
4208 Posts |
Loving the rainbow toning on that last one, and I'm a sucker for bronze. Heres my Constantine II campgate, unfortunately mistruck:  Oh, and thats no Constantine II, thats a Constantius II ( FL IVL CONSTANT IVS NOB C as opposed to CONSTANT INVS IVN NOB C)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United Kingdom
2624 Posts |
Ben forgive my ignorance but Constantius II is the same person as Constantine II?
The legend says Constantius II and it was described as such but I don't know what the significance of that is.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
946 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
4208 Posts |
David - Different people. Constantine had several sons - Constantine II, Constantius II and Constans. All took the throne in 337 following their father's death - so you can get coinage of all of them from the same time in the same style - so its pretty easy to mix your ConstanXs. Quote: Constantius was born in 317 at Sirmium, Pannonia. He was the third son of Constantine the Great, and second by his second wife Fausta, the daughter of Maximian. Constantius was made Caesar by his father on 13 November 324. Quote: The eldest son of Constantine the Great and Fausta, after the death of his half-brother Crispus, Constantine II was born in Arles in February 316 and raised as a Christian. On 1 March 317, he was made Caesar; at the age of seven. Quote: Constans was the third and youngest son of Constantine the Great and Fausta, his father's second wife (born in 323). On 25 December 333, Constantine I elevated Constans to the rank of Caesar at Constantinople.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United Kingdom
2624 Posts |
OO that makes it much more interesting ^^
With names so close I just assumed they were one and the same ^^ I guess I will have to take a look into the history there.
|
| |
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,062 |