| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,008 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
4208 Posts |
What is this?! I believe it says VOT VVV (perhaps some really bad Xs). The obverse seems to have very little legend left - unusually large, I believe it may be too small a flan for the legend to be on flan. This has been tagged onto another post before, but I want to know what this is! So it's got its own thread. Any leads are much appreciated.   Whoever it is, they're draped and cuirassed. a note --> All the 5th century coins you'll see me post have all come from a single uncleaned lot! £12 for 12 coins - I've already got a Marcian, a Hadrian, a leo I and a theodosius II!
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United Kingdom
4208 Posts |
Nobody can help here? If not, Ill enquire with Forvm and any 'experts' who will listen.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
567 Posts |
I'd call it a cull. You can try typng it on wildwinds. Good luck though.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23731 Posts |
I don't think it's VVV, it would have been written as XV. It's probably XXX. The only emperor that comes to mind in this late period that had coins with XXX is Theodosius II.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
2838 Posts |
I think this could be earlier than the others in the batch. I also think its lost quite a bit of 'meat' from the rim. Pretty sure its Constantine.
I'm thinking VOT - XXX - Possibly an A below that?
I think I can see the later part of VOT, the XXX is clear but not particularly well engraved and I also think I see the A below.
Closest I can find.
Constantine I CONSTAN-TINVS AVG DN CONSTANTINI MAX AVG VOT XXX A CONSStar Not listed in RIC
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
2838 Posts |
echizento is correct, Theodosius II did produce these without the outer reverse legend, might be a better explanation than my 'loosing meat' thought.
Pics of these examples needed I think.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United Kingdom
4208 Posts |
JCMWorld - If these are you culls then boy oh boy - I would love access to your culls!
Echizento - Ill check on Theodosius II - hopefully find something.
Bobbyhelmet - its way too crude - and small - to be that early I'm afraid.
Another note - the wreath doesn't align with the text - what a lazy die engraver!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United Kingdom
4208 Posts |
Oops - didnt see your response Bobby!
And thanks guys, I believe thats correct - I hope so too, RIC gives it an R4! Same bust style too.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
2838 Posts |
Edited by bobbyhelmet 01/22/2013 5:04 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United Kingdom
4208 Posts |
Great - R4 if really without the V, and I see no evidence of this. What should I do with it, is the question. The wreath is a seperate style entirely to the example given and the text is rotated in the wreath - similarly, though, there is no mintmark.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
567 Posts |
I'll post a pic of some of my culls from a lot of 80 mixed romans and greeks I picked up a week and a half ago. Some Greek Imperial and Greek I don't feel like puzzling over for hours. Into the cull box they go!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5155 Posts |
isn't that your exact coin type 74 bottom of page?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United Kingdom
4208 Posts |
AN - It is indeed! No V variant of 74. Quite the little rarity, it seems. Rarest coin yet.
JCMWorld - Puzzling is part of the fun!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1549 Posts |
A frustrating thing about 5th century is that even if you can read part of the coin, you rarely get the mint mark or the obverse legend to confirm absolutely what you hope you have. It is possible that the type was issued from several mints and no real way to assign each coin to each possibility. I believe this is why RIC X moved from the separation of coins by mint that we see in earlier volumes. There are just too many coins that will never be identified fully. What gets rough is when you realize a coin can be a better than average specimen and as ugly as sin all at the same time.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United Kingdom
4208 Posts |
Ill see if anything is around the Ex. I'm going to finish cleaning it in the nexzt few days, but I suppose anyting that might be an R4 shouldnt have Ren Wax applied unless I know 100% that its a permanent member of the collection.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United Kingdom
4208 Posts |
No Sign of the V, no sign of the mint mark but whats left of the Ex is smooth as you like.
Any ideas on what I should do with it?
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,008 |
|