Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Mexico 8 Reales 1814 With Wrong Assayer

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 1,375Next Topic  
Valued Member

Germany
194 Posts
 Posted 02/07/2013  5:27 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add dosmundos to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I received a picture of a strange coin from a numismatic friend:

Mexico-8-Reales-1814-With-Wrong-Assayer

The coin has a wrong assayer - FH instead of JJ. My first reaction was that the coin is a silver-plated copper counterfeit, but I was assured that the coin is solid silver, of correct weight, and that the coppery tan of the King is only patina and not copper shining through.

Unfortunately, this is the only picture I have. No edge. Any idea anybody what this could be? I usually believe in "error assayers" as much as I believe in Santa Claus

Would a later-date restrike in good silver be possible?
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 02/07/2013  8:36 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The coin may be solid silver but it is also without a doubt a counterfeit.

The FH assayer is known to exist as a debased silver counterfeit. But this die pair is not documented in our study. The dark streak is very common on counterfeits as is the "odd tone".

The problem with the die is that it uses the wrong letter and number fonts for Mexico City in 1814.

Can NOT be genuine. -

But if it is for sale let me know!
Valued Member
Germany
194 Posts
 Posted 02/08/2013  06:09 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add dosmundos to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
So counterfeit coins with the (wrong) assayer "FH" were produced with several different dies?

Can it be assumed that the wrong assayer was deliberately chosen to make the coins identifiable as fakes to the ones who produced them?

It is then definitely a contemporary counterfeit and not one made for collectors ("Hey, look: unlisted assayer! Veeeery rare!") ?
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 02/08/2013  9:10 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
dosmundos The short answer is YES.

There are several writers who have theorized that counterfeiters made these kinds of mistakes "intentionally" to identify their coins. That makes some sense if they feared getting them back.

So I think debased counterfeits are most likely as having used intentionally incorrect assayer initials. The full weight silver coins would have been taken back only as bullion so identification of those is not as critical.

Are there multiple die pairs - absolutely. Many dates have repeated die pairs with identical "errors".

On just Class 1 counterfeits FH appears with Mo in the three different years 0781 (yes ZERO 781 as if that was ever a real date on a coin) it is like a coin dated BC. There are three 1811's, and one 1817. All of these are debased. There are a bunch of fantasy combinations in addition to initial combinations used in the wrong years.

Once you get into Classes 2 and 3 there are more fantasy coins of course,
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 02/08/2013  9:13 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I may not have been clear - but a later dated full weight silver counterfeit IS DEFINITELY a possibility in this case. If it is under 700 fine it is CONTEMPORARY almost without a doubt.
  Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 1,375Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.21 seconds to rattle this change. Forums