| Author |
Replies: 35 / Views: 4,182 |
|
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
321 Posts |
Silver Eagles will always sell a little better because so many people collect them by date. Investors don't pay $37 for eagles around here. Dealers will pay $1-1.50 over spot if you are lucky and sell them for $3 over spot. I've sold almost all of mine. I'm keeping the 1996s for now. I took the money I made off of eagles and put it into numismatic coins I really wanted. Mind you, most of my silver eagles were bought between $6 and $7 each. That I know we will never see again. I miss the 90s lol.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1200 Posts |
How many threads do we really need to have going about what is essentially one subject (expressed or named in many different ways though it may be)?
CCF really does need to have a separate forum for all this huffing, puffing, ranting, raving, philosophizing, insightizing and punditizing...
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Just dont click on it then. People come new to it all the time. Everything in the world has been discusses before, its really not a big deal
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3789 Posts |
Yea, I agree.
I think a lot of people complain just to complain. lol
I too have been thinking the same thing, I LOVE seeing silver and gold fall, 1- its been a great trade 2- its been great for adding new items to the collection.
SO I mean come on, this poster had the same thought as I been having.
I get the impression people have a hard time with stuff going down lol
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
321 Posts |
I'm sure there are many out there who bought when gold and silver were at or near the high. If that's the case, then that is why they are upset with my post. I know a guy who took out a second mortgage on his house to buy in. What a bad idea. When he asked me what I thought, I gave game him my honest opinion. He wasn't happy to hear it either. I'm not trying to be mean or anything. I just see gold and silver going lower.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3789 Posts |
I mean, prices going down, are a part of life. They happen all the time in the markets,,, and there is a ton of money to be made on the way day, as on the way up. However,circling back to your thread, I mean I think its great, its exciting for collectors such as myself. I can see less enthusiasm for coins I wanted by other collectors which is good for dropping the prices, tho some numismatic stuff is barely budging, other items are dropping, not like a rock but they are moving lower. Take those 5 oz ATB's, you know I completely forgot about those, just so busy. But I will be collecting those going forward, I like that the proofs got knocked down a bit too, the proof eagles which are my favs. so yea, I mean lower prices aren't a bad thing, I had mentioned that in my thread many many months ago.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
2087 Posts |
I started buying gold in 2003 I stopped buying in 2008 as even then I thought that gold was overblown now I think its a bubble akin to the Tulip bubble. Going back to pre ETF days the gold prices were supported by the Indian, middle eastern physical markets and the jewellery trade. Since early 2007 the gold price has been driven by so-called investors. Gold doesn't create wealth like stocks or even bank deposits...it only really does well when fear rules. Since the start of the GFC people who sell gold have been talking hyper inflation and US$10,000 oz gold. It hasn't happened yet and as fear habituation sets in I think gold will fall perhaps as far back as $800.00 oz
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
616 Posts |
I think I am becoming a stacker just looking for opportunities to buy ASEs at good prices on a fairly regular basis.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
593 Posts |
One of the web sites that posts silver and gold prices has a chart that shows yearly percent increase or decrease for the past 10 years and then shows a 10 year average. The 10 year average is the numeric average of the individual year percentages which it totally wrong! If you invest $100 and have a 50% increase to $150 and then a 50% decrease to $75, you did NOT break even!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3692 Posts |
Cost of production: Let's go back to South Africa in 1890 when they were sitting on tons of gold stuck to its raw form and no feasible way to get it out. A ton of this stuff would produce no more than an ounce of pure gold. Finally, cyanidation was introduced to the region and their output went from 1 ton of pure gold in 1886 to 14 tons in 1889 and then to nearly 120 tons in 1898.
(This info came from Peter L. Bernstein's "The Power of Gold".)
The time is coming when we will find our modern version of cyanidation that will allow gold to be either stockpiled or flooded onto the public. The bad thing about gold is that it rarely if ever disappears because it is not very useful outside of the artistic realm.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
561 Posts |
The time is coming when we will find our modern version of cyanidation that will allow gold to be either stockpiled or flooded onto the public.
Oh, you mean kind of like the Fed is doing with the US Dollar? Yet somehow this will destroy the value of gold but no the US Dollar. I wonder which is growing faster, the available ounces of gold or the money supply. Because, while hypothetical, if all other things are held the same if you double the amount of dollars chasing a good (gold) without increasing the supply of the good the price will naturally increase.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
593 Posts |
This notion that the Fed is printing a bunch of fiat currency that is worthless and will flood the market is the same tune your father's generation was pitching in the early 80's. I remember it well, and to quote Yogi Berra, "It's deja vu all over again!" Money is printed all the time and old notes are retired all the time. The Fed controls the money supply, and specifically circulation notes and coins (M0), through various techniques and can constrict M0 just as easily as they can expand it. Printed money isn't put into circulation as it's printed. It's put into circulation as it's needed, and pulled out as needed as well.
Also, this notion of production costs assumes high demand. It's like the oil sands in Canada. They can produce oil at a profit when the price per barrel is high, but curtail production when the price drops. If the global demand for gold drops, only the lowest cost producers will produce, thus lowering the average cost of production. Economics 101.
The bubble is bursting on precious metals and I'm ready to finally pick up some deals when silver settles in the $10 to $15 range ($12 perhaps?) and gold finally drops below $1000 ($750 is my guess). Ten years ago gold was around $375 and silver around $6. When you take away all of the irrational hoarding and hedge fund bets, it's hard to imagine gold and silver commanding MORE than double their pre-bubble values. If it's like the 1980's bubble, gold doubled in price ($200 to $400) but silver dropped back to pre-bubble prices ($5). That may be why silver is declining faster than gold right now. But who knows, this could be a dip before a big run up to $2000 gold and $40 silver. PM markets aren't for the faint of heart!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
2087 Posts |
Quote: Seeing gold drop to around $1,200 wouldn't be a surprise to me but some of the predictions dropping to $800 seem much less likely to me now that you have 3 major Central Banks involved in stimulus The stimulus is there to prevent a depression. The velocity of money is still extremely slow. Much of the hype that pushed up the price of gold was based on a hyper inflation model which was and still is incorrect. The World economy is fighting Deflation and stagflation.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
899 Posts |
larsdog... um not to differ - but the money being printed is being spent. This is different than your analogy. In the past the money was put into storage and then dispensed as needed - today they are printing it and using it to buy government debt. That model is now being used around the world and has many wondering how sustainable it truly is and what the long term ramifications of it are, since it has never been done before.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
561 Posts |
 Maybe printing was the wrong term because most of the "money" that is being created is digital. I am not saying you are wrong about this being a bubble, it may very well be, but I think trying to use the past as proof is dangerous. There are a LOT of things that are different today and they all seem to be working in favor of PMs not against them at least long term. I may be taking pause on my buying of physical silver and gold but I am certainly not ready to bet against it long term,
|
| |
Replies: 35 / Views: 4,182 |