Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsJoin Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

First Strike- Really A Better Coin?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 32 / Views: 4,638Next Topic
Page: of 3
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts
 Posted 04/24/2014  4:39 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add just carl to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
If, say for example, 50,000 silver Great Smokey Mountain quarters was the final number of mintage for this coin. What % of this is considered first strike? What is the cut off point?

Interesting point of view. Are those 1st Strike(s) or 1st Strike. Just how many are or could be 1st Strike(s). Where does the 1st Strike end or does it? Actually, as with the topic of this post, it is 1ST STRIKE. That means only ONE coin could be that 1ST STRIKE. Other than that, 1st strikes could go on and on and on and on. Only when someone lables a coin as 2ND STRIKE, does the 1st end.
This all means we should have 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc. strike coins all the way to possibly the 5,00,000,000th coin. Now picture a coin with the lable of the 5 millionth strike coin.
Pillar of the Community
barryg's Avatar
United States
5862 Posts
 Posted 04/24/2014  5:02 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add barryg to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The question isn't whether coins with "first strike" labels are currently worth more to [certain] collectors. The question is whether they will still command a premium down the road for those people who consider coins to be investments.

I'm of the opinion that the labels are just another gimmick to increase sales and any increase in value is wholly incidental and likely to be short lived. I mean, I love DMPL Morgan dollars because they are DMPL. True, they may be DMPL because they were early strikes off a new die, but I wouldn't pay extra for an early struck Morgan dollar that wasn't DMPL.

Of course, I could be wrong. Maybe in 20 years anything with a "first strike" label will be worth twice anything without that label. Or maybe the market for modern bullion coins will drop out completely and nobody will value a PF70 "First Strike" ASE any higher than spot value. Ask me again in 20 years...
  Previous TopicReplies: 32 / Views: 4,638Next Topic
Page: of 3

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.23 seconds to rattle this change. Forums