The question isn't whether coins with "first strike" labels are currently worth more to [certain] collectors. The question is whether they will still command a premium down the road for those people who consider coins to be investments.
I'm of the opinion that the labels are just another gimmick to increase sales and any increase in value is wholly incidental and likely to be short lived. I mean, I love DMPL Morgan dollars because they are DMPL. True, they may be DMPL because they were early strikes off a new die, but I wouldn't pay extra for an early struck Morgan dollar that wasn't DMPL.
Of course, I could be wrong. Maybe in 20 years anything with a "first strike" label will be worth twice anything without that label. Or maybe the market for modern bullion coins will drop out completely and nobody will value a PF70 "First Strike" ASE any higher than spot value. Ask me again in 20 years...
I'm of the opinion that the labels are just another gimmick to increase sales and any increase in value is wholly incidental and likely to be short lived. I mean, I love DMPL Morgan dollars because they are DMPL. True, they may be DMPL because they were early strikes off a new die, but I wouldn't pay extra for an early struck Morgan dollar that wasn't DMPL.
Of course, I could be wrong. Maybe in 20 years anything with a "first strike" label will be worth twice anything without that label. Or maybe the market for modern bullion coins will drop out completely and nobody will value a PF70 "First Strike" ASE any higher than spot value. Ask me again in 20 years...


















