| Author |
Replies: 25 / Views: 2,680 |
|
Valued Member
United States
238 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
245 Posts |
MS65, very nice coin!
Hrm, looked at it with PCGS and now I'm thinking higher.. will be interested to see.
Edited by Shale 01/07/2015 9:32 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1949 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
245 Posts |
Originally I was focusing on the back too much, now I'm wondering if its actually on the edge and AU58 instead? I'm bad at this :)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1094 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18645 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1531 Posts |
 with AU58, nice luster but some signs of wear. The reverse is spotless, nice coin!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
245 Posts |
I think the wide range of opinions coin are interesting... this is definitely one of those where first glance is BAM, then follow up longer look brings more into play. Reverse is max detail, obverse it what brings this down I think.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1005 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4409 Posts |
Initial thought is MS63 or MS64. Someone correct me if I'm wrong but that reverse looks really well struck too.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
898 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
I guess MS-63. I think the reverse is MS but the toning on the obverse makes it a little tougher to say for sure.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1094 Posts |
I love this coin. Still don't see any wear, but who knows for sure YET?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1132 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 25 / Views: 2,680 |