To show you that PCGS is inconsistent just as much as any other grading service and why services like PCI and SEGS should be allowed to be listed as legitimate companies. I am attempting to list some photos of PCGS XF40 20 cent pieces.
The official grading standards of the
ANA, which is the evil police state that is leading
ebay around by the nose hairs, states that an EF coin must have "LIBERTY sharp. Only slight wear on high points of the coin."
Image:
75044d.jpg95.36 KB
Looking at this coin, you see LIBERTY is not full nor sharp and the eagle is pretty worn.
Image:
75045d.jpg98.29 KB
This one is a better-detail coin. I could go XF on this if I really wanted to fill a hole in my type set in a hurry.
Image:
75046d.jpg93.7 KB
The front of this one reminds me of the last one as far as detail, but the reverse.... no way!
Image:
75047d.jpg88.7 KB
A nice VF in an XF wrapper.
Image:
206334d.jpg100.35 KB
Nice GOUGE on the front of this F12 obv. VF30 rev. in an XF slab.
Image:
220634d.jpg100.44 KB
A nice XF with a weakly struck shield. At least SEGS will label the slab as weakly struck so when the lister uses a pic from far away and you can't see the weak details, you could at least read it on the SEGS slab instead of doing what most people do with PCGS slabs and buy sight unseen.
Now I want to show you two raw coins of what a real XF should look like. They are both listed as XF coins. One by a PNG dealer. And incidently, the PCGS coins are all listed by PNG dealers as well.
Image:
ee4b_1.jpg39.84 KB
I wish the picture size was bigger. But this coin is sharp and a full LIBERTY.
Image:
33341d.jpg61.86 KB
A small ding but this is the quality of a real XF 20 cent piece.
My objection to
ebay's new regime rules is not with the basement slabs disappearing from the marketplace, but with two legitimate companies, PCI and SEGS. These rules are damaging to these companies and will put them out of business.
The
ANA has never liked these companies from the first survey that they sent out. Not everyone has the money to pay for the outrageous fees that PCGS and NGC charge. PCI and SEGS and ANACS are the working man's grading company. I am surprised ANACS made the cut as they are in the same quality zone in my opinion as SEGS and PCI. Plus the new ANACS slabs are easy to crack into.
The big lesson here though is that although everyone in coins says "buy the coin and not the slab", they do not mean it. Everyone here that agrees with
ebay's new policy does not believe in "the coin over the slab". Your status as a collector is questionable. Maybe you should label yourself as an investor. Most of my coins are raw. I do own coins in NGC, PCGS, ANACS, ICG, PCI and SEGS slabs. I did what everyone declares is the right things to do. Read about the coin and learn how to grade and authenticate. Educate yourself.
Supporting this new policy takes the need of educating yourself away. This new policy takes away my right to grade a raw coin. I have been collecting coins for 36 years! My skills at grading circulated coins are just as good as anybody at a grading service. Aren't yours?!? If there is a newbie collector out there who doesn't want to get ripped off, then do what we all had to do. Your homework. Either that or learn a lesson.
The
ANA and
ebay policy is wrong to exclude these two legitimate services. Different people grade differently. If a service cannot repeatedly grade a coin according to the same standards time after time, then all grading is illegitimate to some degree.
The
ANA should not support any grading service that does not abide by their affixed grading standards, yet they do.
Maybe a better policy is to put a close up of the coin on the listing and a description and show no sign of the slab. Don't mention any grading service and let the coin sell itself instead of the slab dictating the price. Let's live up to what we all profess we believe. Buy the coin, not the slab. Not listing or showing any slab will put your money where your money is.