| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,235 |
|
|
New Member
United States
40 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7390 Posts |
Hi and  ... I love colorful morgans but I'm on the fence with this one to weather or not I like it  I'll go with 63
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
 to CCF. I'm not even going to try and toss a grade at this one. Knowing how tough it is to capture tone in a static photo much less through plastic, I'll just say I'll bet she's a real looker in hand. 
|
|
New Member
 United States
40 Posts |
got one more pic, hopefully shows the luster a little better.... 
|
|
New Member
United States
15 Posts |
Im going to say they gave it an MS64.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1788 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 United States
40 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
Very nice.  It's really tough to capture the true essence of a toned coin in a static photo. What camera are you using?
|
|
New Member
 United States
40 Posts |
thanks  i believe it was a canon point and shoot (at my brother's place taking those) coin has A LOT of luster, which was hard to capture well, but I think helped to bump it up with the + grade
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7390 Posts |
Just decided... I LOVE IT! 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Chances are the toning caused the plus; it's certainly a lovely coin. But toners can't be graded via images. Toning hides the marks. I'd never have seen a 65 in this coin.
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,235 |
|