Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Specializing in Modern Numismatics Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall 300,000 items to help build your collection! Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsRoyal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1796 Draped Bust Cent

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 12 / Views: 1,657Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
GERMANICVS's Avatar
Germany
1849 Posts
 Posted 04/12/2015  10:32 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add GERMANICVS to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Here is an 1796 Draped Bust cent for you guys to grade.

1796 Draped Bust cents are scarce overall, and, scarcer generally than the 1796 Flowing Hairs in my opinion. It is a date I am very fond of.

This particular one is an S-97, one of the commoner varieties. The obverse is not too bad, while the reverse shows some light granularity, I believe often seen on this variety. The coin has a good overall appearance.

How would you grade her?



1796-Draped-Bust-Cent

1796-Draped-Bust-Cent
Pillar of the Community
Celticsoul's Avatar
United States
1566 Posts
 Posted 04/12/2015  10:45 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Celticsoul to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Wow another great coin GERMANICVS. As far as sharpness I will say that it is a solid F-12. The question is how does one net grade this coin? The porosity is moderate but enough for me to net grade it to VG-8. Once again I'm confronted with a problem that I have and that is the tendency I have to grade rarer coins higher than less rare coins. Is the fact that this is a 1796 affect my grading? This is one of the prejudices I'm trying to overcome as a grader.
Pillar of the Community
yhbearcats's Avatar
United States
688 Posts
 Posted 04/12/2015  4:09 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add yhbearcats to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
F-12. As always with your coins, just amazing!
Pillar of the Community
SilverStackerKid's Avatar
United States
6478 Posts
 Posted 04/12/2015  7:29 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SilverStackerKid to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
F-12, awesome.
Bedrock of the Community
Learn More...
panzaldi's Avatar
United States
18685 Posts
 Posted 04/12/2015  8:31 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add panzaldi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
What's interesting about this coin is that it exhibits decent detail on the higher areas yet the rims are solidly into the letters. Moderate porosity on both sides and the rim wear I think would net this to VG8. Commenting in celticsoul concerning grading rarer coins. My comment would be to ignore the rarity and just grade the coin for what it is that way your grading will be consistant. Where I have a challenge is not with rarity but with coins where there is known issues with the series such as the 1808-1814 classic heads where planchet issues with corrosion as well as the inferior copper used is quite common. In these cases I tend to be more lenient for some reason.
Pillar of the Community
edweather's Avatar
United States
7375 Posts
 Posted 04/12/2015  9:23 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add edweather to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
F12
Pillar of the Community
Celticsoul's Avatar
United States
1566 Posts
 Posted 04/12/2015  11:13 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Celticsoul to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
What's interesting about this coin is that it exhibits decent detail on the higher areas yet the rims are solidly into the letters

I was just reading Breen's Encyclopedia of Early United States Cents earlier today where he stated that in 1796 and early 1797 the planchets that were used had to have the rims upset at the mint instead of having them already prepared and this led to these issues having weak rims. It's funny that you mention that as I was just reading that today.
Pillar of the Community
CoinCollector2012's Avatar
United States
8137 Posts
 Posted 04/13/2015  10:26 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add CoinCollector2012 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
F-12
Bedrock of the Community
IndianGoldEagle's Avatar
United States
36826 Posts
 Posted 04/13/2015  12:13 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add IndianGoldEagle to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
F-12 details
Bedrock of the Community
Learn More...
panzaldi's Avatar
United States
18685 Posts
 Posted 04/13/2015  6:36 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add panzaldi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for the info celticsoul. Most enlightening as to the reason behind this as it defies the logic of typical wear. This then begs the question...does one account for this when grading since since this occurred at the mint prior to striking. You can see in this case I deducted for the rims thinking it wear. I would reassess based on the new data presented and regrade this coin F12 with a net of VG10 for light corrosion
Pillar of the Community
Celticsoul's Avatar
United States
1566 Posts
 Posted 04/13/2015  9:19 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Celticsoul to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
GERMANICVS and I just discussed this last week with a different coin. Weak strikes and mint issues like weak rims don't affect the grade but they do affect the price.
Pillar of the Community
GERMANICVS's Avatar
Germany
1849 Posts
 Posted 04/14/2015  09:25 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add GERMANICVS to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I just spent time viewing some 1796 draped bust cents in the HA archives. It really does seem like scarce/rare coins 'get a pass' from the TPGs.

This is the way the auction house describes the surfaces of this specimen:
''Surfaces. Dark chocolate with some splashes of deeper steel color, the surfaces exhibiting faint verdigris that is somewhat more prominent on the reverse. Two fine scratches cross each other on the bust and through the hair''.

It is a rare variety (S-105), and very desirable,for sure but I would not describe the surfaces so lightly.

It is human nature I suppose.


1796-Draped-Bust-Cent

1796-Draped-Bust-Cent
Bedrock of the Community
Learn More...
panzaldi's Avatar
United States
18685 Posts
 Posted 04/14/2015  7:29 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add panzaldi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I would have described those surfaces as moderate to heavy porosity. What's interesting is they don't even mention it at all
  Previous TopicReplies: 12 / Views: 1,657Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.38 seconds to rattle this change. Forums