I know this book well. It is a die study of a hoard. It is not intended for collectors and has little to interest them. It is a scholarly study of dies. He finds minor distinctions that he regards as indicating the coin is from a different die than other, extremely similar, strikes. Not everyone agrees with his die identities.
I don't see why anyone but a die-study scholar would want this monograph.
I don't see why anyone but a die-study scholar would want this monograph.



















