| Author |
Replies: 10 / Views: 7,694 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
513 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
190 Posts |
No sorry its not a small date
|
|
Valued Member
Spain
239 Posts |
No it's not a small date. For your perusal, the lower is the small date.. 
Edited by UKPennyHunter 10/08/2015 05:12 am
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
190 Posts |
UK penny hunter .
What do you mean your hundred years off ,completely different coin.
I am intrigued though with your 1963 small date theory ,think you must be getting a bit confussed.
|
|
Valued Member
Spain
239 Posts |
Sorry one small mistake, it should have read;
"No it's not a small date"
But I don't get what you mean by 100 years off? I have no 1963 small date theory!
Edited by UKPennyHunter 10/07/2015 11:15 am
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
190 Posts |
The picture of the coin you put up ,can you tell me what it is please ?.
|
|
Valued Member
Spain
239 Posts |
It's a comparison between a small date 1862 penny and a normal date penny.
If you type in "1862 small date penny" in google, this is the first image you get.
I'm still confused about this 1963 penny you talk about, I didn't even mention anything like that!
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
190 Posts |
Well at least we are getting there SLOWLY.........
Can you now look at the DATE on the picture that you got off google and tell me what it is ?.
|
|
Valued Member
Spain
239 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Spain
239 Posts |
What the crapper CoinCommunity? I uploaded one picture and it actually uploaded another.. It shows as the one I think it is, but when check on my phone (not logged in) then I can see that it is a completely different picture.
Sorry PWA, I see the confusion now! I've changed the picture, I hope..
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
190 Posts |
Well at least thats sorted out.
The stacks bowers coin is also miss attributed and should not be used as a comparable.
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 7,694 |
|