Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Specializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer 300,000 items to help build your collection! Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

The Eventual Return Of The Silver Dollar...

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 29 / Views: 2,707Next Topic
Page: of 2
Valued Member
GFR3's Avatar
United States
473 Posts
 Posted 01/23/2008  10:39 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add GFR3 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
quote:
Plus, the idea that the President of the United States could, much less should, direct the Congress to undertake such folly is frankly unsupportable under our Constitution, which, among other things, specifically excludes the coining of money from Presidential powers and gives it to Congress


Funny you mention this....I was having nearly the same conversation with my cousin a few weeks back... basically, after hours and hours of points and counter-points we came to a stand still--In order for the President to bring about 100% reform (or any reform at all) and undo some of the illegal laws and such that exist, the President would have to use powers that were not granted to him in the first place. The Constitution would have to be broken in order to nullify laws that are, by their very nature, illegal--Is it okay to break the law to fix the law? I say no, it would defeat the purpose of the Revolution and make us no worse than the "enemey"--sorta like a Punk band getting its message out by selling out to the industry. Flawed in principle....but whatever, my heads spinning just trying to think about it...


I honestly can say that I truely believe over the coming decades we should be slowly weened back onto the Standard. I can see a system in place one day where we have, idk, say a 10 dollar silver coin instead of the old 1 dollar coin. An ounce of silver=a 10 dollar Silver coin/a 10 dollar Silver Certificate? IDK, just throwing even numbers around. hmmm...kinda like the old Eagles, only using silver instead of gold, simply because it would cause less turmoil during the initial conversion. Maybe gold could be used in bigger denominations? Like, at roughly current prices, 1/8 ounce of Gold=$100? IDK just typing whats popping in my head.

Thoughts?

--Gary
Edited by GFR3
01/23/2008 10:41 pm
Valued Member
Norcal Jim's Avatar
United States
128 Posts
 Posted 01/23/2008  11:19 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Norcal Jim to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
You all forget how money is really made. Yes the government prints/coins our currency. However, it is the banks that create the majority of money, as debt. Here is a link to a video that explains how http://video.google.com/videoplay?d...362583451279
video is 45 min but educational :)
Edited by Norcal Jim
01/24/2008 12:38 am
Valued Member
Canada
82 Posts
 Posted 01/23/2008  11:46 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add grmike to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
what about 5 and 10 dollar coins ? 5 dollars in silver might be around the size of Canada's 2 dollar coin.

1 dollar coins could be half silver half copper and be the size of the Sacagawea dollar.

because silver prices fluctuate a lot, look at its trends for the last 40 years and peg the price to the average number. 20 dollars an ource sounds about right.
Edited by grmike
01/23/2008 11:49 pm
Valued Member
neuron's Avatar
United States
254 Posts
 Posted 01/24/2008  11:17 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add neuron to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I don't think any laws would need to be broken to fix the system... simply repeal the Federal Reserve Act and start issuing Greenbacks.

Instead of borrowing money from private banks with interest (debt), the US could simply issue its own money. The answer is so simple, it is mind-boggling.

Getting politicians to change things is very difficult since most of them receive substantial kick-backs from banks and corporations. Banks have so much money and power that they can easily influence any election... for example, they were instrumental in getting Woodrow Wilson in office, who had promised to push and sign the Federal Reserve Act.

Most of the major media outlets are owned by the same banks that comprise the Federal Reserve, so criticism of the current system is largely repressed. Of course, this leads to lack of education on the part of the populace- probably less than 1% of US citizens know where our money comes from. Most believe the government makes it.

Ownership of the media also allows control of political commercials and campaigns... anyone remember how Ron Paul was not invited to the FOX presidential debate a few weeks ago, even though he was performing much better than Giuliani? No explanation was provided by FOX for this slight.

The internet is really the last bastion of free speech, and there are even calls to regulate that.

Would dismantling the Federal Reserve cause some economic chaos? Yes, certainly... mainly because most people wouldn't know what was going on. But with some education, things would be fine after a short time. Germany rebounded from WWI by issuing its own money and within 4 years was an extremely strong nation again, even after paying off its war debts.

Once people realize that we can survive much better without being under the heavy thumb of private debt, it will be nothing short of a revolution. Almost all of our taxes go to pay the interest on our debt, while the principle remains untouched and continues to grow yearly. Soon, we will be unable to pay the interest without even more tax hikes, and the US will essentially default on its loans. Maybe that is the stimulus we need for reform.

Regards,
~neuron
Valued Member
Stephen420's Avatar
United States
411 Posts
 Posted 01/24/2008  4:04 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Stephen420 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Neuron wrote:
"Most of the major media outlets are owned by the same banks that comprise the Federal Reserve, so criticism of the current system is largely repressed."

Could you please give an example? I didn't know Rupert Murdoch was a banker.
Pillar of the Community
chrycopaul's Avatar
Canada
1106 Posts
 Posted 01/24/2008  4:33 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add chrycopaul to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

quote:
I disagree that we'll ever eliminate cash completely. I think that there is a significant amount of the lower class who only lives on cash. As the middle class falls out, that is just going to increase. Then again, even food stamps are now distributed on plastic, so maybe I don't know what the heck I'm talking about.


The only time I use cash is at the coffee shop, and that is because they do not take debit cards. Everything else is electronic.

Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
188440 Posts
 Posted 01/24/2008  5:03 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I probably spend no more than $100 in cash every month. Everything else is with a plastic card or EFT. I could easily make it less than $20, but I like to get the change and look through it!
Valued Member
CuprousCoin's Avatar
United States
226 Posts
 Posted 01/24/2008  6:27 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add CuprousCoin to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
What happens when technology advances to the point where gold and silver are manufactured through atomic manipulation ? So much for the gold/silver standard.
Pillar of the Community
KurtS's Avatar
United States
5318 Posts
 Posted 01/24/2008  6:33 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add KurtS to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
quote:
What happens when technology advances to the point where gold and silver are manufactured through atomic manipulation ?


Star Trek shows aside, that would be a very costly and dangerous process--and would produce numerous unstable isotopes that would make the metal unsafe for everyday use. This is how Polonium and other short-lived elements are produced.
Edited by KurtS
01/24/2008 7:13 pm
Valued Member
GFR3's Avatar
United States
473 Posts
 Posted 01/24/2008  6:40 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add GFR3 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
LOL jbuck...I do the same thing. A Coffee at Starbucks costs $2.11, but with my discount it is something like $1.95....I waive the discount just for the extra coins hah

Great link Norcal Jim, extremly educational and very easy to follow.

quote:
I don't think any laws would need to be broken to fix the system... simply repeal the Federal Reserve Act and start issuing Greenbacks.

Instead of borrowing money from private banks with interest (debt), the US could simply issue its own money. The answer is so simple, it is mind-boggling.


How would the Act be repealed by any means other than by the President? Congress, like you said, has too much invested in the current system and the Supreme Court (current Supreme Court that is) wouldn't even consider doing something like that--they just never get it right anymore. The only legal way it will happen is if half+1 of the congressmen and the Executive are replaced by uncorrupt, educated people--and with a 98% chance of getting relected it doesn't look so good for us.

Changing the system will not be easy (people have been fighting for it for almost 100 years now) but it one day will happen and it will benefit us all.


Stephen, Rupert Murdoch isn't a banker and, to tell you the truth, I'm not really sure where/how his family obtained their money. I doubt through banks because that is the sort of thing we'd ll have heard about by now. I don't know what his connection to the FED is, or if he even has one. I just dislike him because he is a liar and has brainwashed so many people with nothing but a television set and pure poppycock. I've never felt the desire to learn anything at all about the man. Just my personal opinion on the matter of course ;)


As for the atomic question.....I think thats a challenge that will be met someday (the sun converts elements to other elements all day) but I think we mortals are a few millenia away from that. THough when we finally are able to do something like that, and do it safely and cost effeciently.... whos knows?

--Gary
Edited by GFR3
01/24/2008 6:44 pm
Valued Member
neuron's Avatar
United States
254 Posts
 Posted 01/24/2008  8:54 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add neuron to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
quote:
Could you please give an example? I didn't know Rupert Murdoch was a banker.


Hey Stephen, I'm having difficulty locating a specific example from the book I'm reading ("Web of Debt" by Ellen Brown), but there are several times wherein the author discusses collusion between banks and the media (along with other large corporations). Perhaps "own" isn't the most appropriate term, although it wouldn't surprise me if investment banks own significant portions of stock in media conglomerates. But they are certainly bedfellows if nothing else. Apparently it is quite common for banks, media, and other large corporations to share directors on their boards:

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2870

http://www.progressiveliving.org/ma...politics.htm

I don't think Rupert Murdoch is a banker per se, but someone worth billions of dollars is certainly keen on the banking industry. As of August he owns Dow Jones, which publishes the Wall Street Journal.

I'll keep looking for more specific information and post it here if I find some.

Oh, and I rarely use cash nowadays... that stuff burns a hole in my pocket for some reason. I find that I don't spend as much if I put it on my credit card. Doesn't make much sense, I know, but that's how I operate for some reason.

Regards,
~neuron
Bedrock of the Community
Conder101's Avatar
United States
17884 Posts
 Posted 01/26/2008  06:11 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Conder101 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
quote:
It seems that the best answer would be for our government to actually make the money, as opposed to the Federal Reserve (a private international consortium of banks including JPMorgan Chase, Citibank, Bank of America, and many more). THAT's the main problem- the US isn't in charge of its own money! We need to return to the Greenback system.

Are you sure that's a good idea? At last the Fed tries to exert some control over the economy. You're talking about turning it over to a group that thinks "We've spent more than we have. Just take more money from the people. We'd like to spend an extra hundred billion here, just print it. We have a three hundred billion dollar budget deficit, that's OK we still have ink and paper." In short they think the same way Germany did in the early 20's. We have to pay all these reparations, so we'll just print the money we need. The result would be hyperinflation. The whole point behind the creation of the Fed was to take the creation of the money out of the hands of the special interest politicians who cared more about their own careers or maybe their local constituents that the country as a whole.
Valued Member
neuron's Avatar
United States
254 Posts
 Posted 01/26/2008  11:51 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add neuron to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
quote:
Are you sure that's a good idea? At last the Fed tries to exert some control over the economy. You're talking about turning it over to a group that thinks "We've spent more than we have. Just take more money from the people. We'd like to spend an extra hundred billion here, just print it. We have a three hundred billion dollar budget deficit, that's OK we still have ink and paper." In short they think the same way Germany did in the early 20's. We have to pay all these reparations, so we'll just print the money we need. The result would be hyperinflation. The whole point behind the creation of the Fed was to take the creation of the money out of the hands of the special interest politicians who cared more about their own careers or maybe their local constituents that the country as a whole.


An excellent point, and I'll do my best to explain the answer. However, I won't be able to do justice to the thorough review of material presented in "Web of Debt", so consider picking that up or borrowing it from the library for a very detailed analysis.

The government handed the ability to create money to a private for-profit entity, who are largely unconcerned with the state of a nation so long as it is owed plenty of debt. I used to think that politicians were promising billions of dollars for projects and simply running the printing presses and raising taxes to pay for it, but that's not exactly what happens. What happens is the government asks the Federal Reserve for a loan for the billions, who then create it with a ledger entry. This money, created simply with a mouse click out of thin air, is then used to purchase US Government bonds, aka debts, and charges interest on repayment. Taxes are raised by the government to cover the new loan and its interest charges.

Since this is how our system works, there is literally no way that our debt can ever be repayed unless the system changes. The debt and interest charges will both simply continue to increase until the taxpayers can no longer cover the exorbitant fees and default on the loan.

So what is the difference if the US Government made the money out of thin air instead? We wouldn't owe the money to any private entity, and thus there would be no national debt. Without a debt, we wouldn't need taxes such as the income tax. The government could still cover costs of social programs and infrastructure by making loans to individuals and corporations but also charging interest... but they have to create the interest money at the same time so that it actually exists. The interest money is used to pay workers for infrastructure and social projects.

The concern about hyperinflation is legitimate, but this has happened several times in the past in various countries (including our own) and hyperinflation didn't occur. The reason for this is because as the amount of debt-free money increases, goods and services also increase... that is, more people work and produce when more money is available. So long as the money is issued for completed work, inflation won't result. The hyperinflation of Germany's currency was caused by foreign speculation on the privately-issued Reichsbank mark, and the problem was fixed by adopting a Greenback system in which Germany produced its own currency.

Look no further than China for an example of a modern-day economic success story. Although they still have some reliance on foreign countries, they issue their own money and are not in a state of inflation... they are in a state of a very strong and growing economy. Part of their success is not allowing their currency to float on currency exchange markets, so it is not available for speculation.

"Web of Debt" explains both the Germany and China situations in much more detail, if you are interested. Hope I at least gave you something of a coherent answer though.

Regards,
~neuron
Valued Member
GFR3's Avatar
United States
473 Posts
 Posted 01/26/2008  3:01 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add GFR3 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Well put Neuron, stated much clearer than if I would have said it. The way I see it, the FedRes does a job (money supply) that should be done directly by the FedGov't. I believe very deeply in a weak Federal Government, but I do grant them the power to coin and produce money--it simply is alot easier and more effiecent than most of the other systems we could implement. The Department of the Treasury? Shouldn't the production of currency fall under them?

If I recall correctly, upwards of 95% of our Federal Income Tax goes to pay the debt owed to the FedRes. Get rid of the Fed and use the revenue for other things....or better yet, do the unheard of and get rid of the Fed AND the tax. Instead of giving everyone $600 this spring why don't the Gov't stop taking our money in the first place and let us spend it how we see fit....that would certainly help the economy and seems a little closer to fair and just

--Gary
  Previous TopicReplies: 29 / Views: 2,707Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.42 seconds to rattle this change. Forums