| Author |
 Replies: 280 / Views: 21,028 |
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
314 Posts |
You were a smart kid, G-R.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
314 Posts |
 The DDO is the one Lincoln I don't have, would like to have, and can't afford. Again, I wish I had been smarter like G-R back when they were costly but not absurdly so. Anyway, here's another humble circulation find just to add to the page. |
|
Valued Member
United States
314 Posts |
I'm fairly new here, so may I ask this question: has this date-a-day thing ever been done for LMCs? I did a search and did not find it unless I missed something. If not, may I suggest that we do so as soon as this one ends? I'm a LWC fan like everyone else, but Lincolns don't instantly lose all their appeal after 1958. We just need someone with more juice than I have to start it. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19930 Posts |
Lincoln Cent Lover!VERDI-CARE™ INVENTOR https://verdi.care/
|
|
Valued Member
United States
314 Posts |
Nice ones, BadThad. That's not an improper alloy, that's a beautiful alloy. And I love the cross-hatch looking coin. I don't know if that effect has a name.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
681 Posts |
The 'improper alloy' coin is very cool!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19930 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
441 Posts |
The day got away from me!! 1955 one more time.. We used to have 1955 DDO, but we sold it to buy our house. (the down payment was 14 cents face!) 1955:    Edited by mamastinky
02/16/2016 12:46 am
|
|
Valued Member
United States
441 Posts |
Nice '55's BadThad! not sure which I like best, to be honest, although that first woody has captured my heart.
Quick question, everyone.. I'm not exactly sure if my proof is naturally toned. What do you folks think?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
14463 Posts |
I would guess artificial toning (AT) maybe from exposure to a flame.  BTW - you should not go backwards in date. Once a post has been made for the next day, you should not go back. |
|
Valued Member
United States
441 Posts |
Forgive me, I am still catching on. The original post said, "1 Day grace for catching up" in the rules, so now I feel a little sheepish and confused.
I understand the reasons it is best to post the dates consecutively. Should I remove the post?
Edited by mamastinky
02/16/2016 04:19 am
|
|
Moderator
United States
14463 Posts |
that "1 Day grace for catching up..." is a newish rule to me. The post you have already made leave it unchanged
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3054 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3054 Posts |
1957   |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19930 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 280 / Views: 21,028 |
First Page
Previous Page
Posted 02/15/2016 4:31 pm
