Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Specializing in Modern Numismatics Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin Auctions300,000 items to help build your collection! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Collecting British Coins?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 56 / Views: 10,299Next Topic
Page: of 4
New Member
United Kingdom
6 Posts
 Posted 02/22/2006  05:22 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add arfadaley to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hi All. I am a Collector of English coins in general .Anything I like I buy.As to collecting a series if your looking pre 1800 then you need to be Rich! coins from 1600-1800 are not cheap ie shilling 1700's can range between $50-$400 just for F grade and the halfcrown $80-$600in F .All depending on which bust type etc.I would if I had to choose a series it would definatley be the Gothic Florin.A nice compact group 1848-1887. there are roughly 60 coins in the series.+/-
a few die varieties.In the main anything from $40 for F too $5000 for the extreme rarities.Which considering prices of other denominations Is quite reasonable. I suggest you purchase 41st edition of spinks coins of england £20 .online anywhere even ebay. Comprehensive and very detailed fully illustrated book with every known coin minted since the celts and romans.
Hope this is of some interest.

Arfa

Image: Collecting-British-Coins?????????? gorh.jpg
38.31 KB
Valued Member
Ętheling's Avatar
United Kingdom
438 Posts
 Posted 02/22/2006  05:55 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Ętheling to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Pre-1800 shilling are expensive, 1670s-1780s sixpences were a little more affordable. Although I went off at the deep end as usually and was doing a date set of them in gVF-aEF.

I had a load of Charles II & George II ones, but I've sold them all now. Bad judgment? Perhaps, but one day i'll get some more cos I just love em.

Pillar of the Community
KLD's Avatar
Australia
1079 Posts
 Posted 02/23/2006  10:01 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add KLD to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I too love this era. I just purchased a bunch of Henry the 3rd , Edward 1 through to 3 Pennies and Groats.

There are a few Edward pennies that I might need some help identifying which Edward the coin belongs too.

Is there anyone here that would be able to help me? Happy to post pictures if there is someone that can help me.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Valued Member
Ętheling's Avatar
United Kingdom
438 Posts
 Posted 02/24/2006  04:47 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Ętheling to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yeah if you post pictures i'll have a go at attributing them to classes, it might take me a while though.
Pillar of the Community
KLD's Avatar
Australia
1079 Posts
 Posted 02/25/2006  01:39 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add KLD to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Aetheling as long as it is not too much trouble, it would bre greatly appreciated.

Below are two different UK pennies. I have been told they are both King Edwatd pennies from the LOndon Mint. My questions is which Edward do they belong to, 1, 2 or 3?

Any help would be greatly appreciated. let me know which side of the coin you need.

http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c...6-edward.jpg

http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c...1-edward.jpg

Regards,
lars
Valued Member
Ętheling's Avatar
United Kingdom
438 Posts
 Posted 02/26/2006  04:33 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Ętheling to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
quote:
Originally posted by KLD

Aetheling as long as it is not too much trouble, it would bre greatly appreciated.

Below are two different UK pennies. I have been told they are both King Edwatd pennies from the LOndon Mint. My questions is which Edward do they belong to, 1, 2 or 3?

Any help would be greatly appreciated. let me know which side of the coin you need.

http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c...6-edward.jpg

http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c...1-edward.jpg

Regards,
lars



I can narrow it down a bit for you just from that picture (which is a bit hard to see).

It's either Edward I or Edward II (I favour Edward I myself... cos they usually are, although I can't be sure on that until I get a better picture). It is from the Class 10C onwards run upto Class 15C, some of those classes more than others, Notably 10C-10F. (i.e last coins of Edward I's reign, although Class 10 is attribute to Edward I the date run for the issue is 1302-1310, and since Edward I died in 1307 a good deal may be issues of Edward II's reign anyhow).

The only way I can narrow it down further is with a better picture, the crown type is particularly important (this should be a bifoliate crown, i.e two prongs at either end of it rather than three of the earlier issues).

Lettering types, Closed E's and open E's, Roman and Lombardic N's also differ between classes (evidence of any reversed letters? S's and N's particularly). Your's has Roman N's (the H in hYB, just before the small cross on the obverse, is Lombardics).



Pillar of the Community
wrk4lvg's Avatar
United States
756 Posts
 Posted 02/26/2006  05:03 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wrk4lvg to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
My fav British coin is my 1994 2pound piece.

Very cool.
Pillar of the Community
KLD's Avatar
Australia
1079 Posts
 Posted 02/26/2006  05:06 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add KLD to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
WOW, What can I say.

I didn't think it was that complicated, yet so very interesting.

Thankyou very much for your time. I will try and get better pictures soon.

Am I correct in saying if it has two prongs on either side of the crown it is more likely to be a Edward the 2nd and the three prongs to be Edward the 1st?

I was lost on the restI am going to have to work harder to pick up this knowledge.

The below one is a slighlty better picture of a different coin.
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c...2-edward.jpg
Is it King Edward 2nd? or am I way off?

Finally where does Edward the third come into identification or is he harder to find?

Once again any help is greatly appreciated.

Kind Regards,
Lars
Valued Member
Ętheling's Avatar
United Kingdom
438 Posts
 Posted 02/26/2006  07:12 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Ętheling to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
quote:
Originally posted by KLD

WOW, What can I say.

I didn't think it was that complicated, yet so very interesting.

Thankyou very much for your time. I will try and get better pictures soon.

Am I correct in saying if it has two prongs on either side of the crown it is more likely to be a Edward the 2nd and the three prongs to be Edward the 1st?

I was lost on the restI am going to have to work harder to pick up this knowledge.

The below one is a slighlty better picture of a different coin.
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c...2-edward.jpg
Is it King Edward 2nd? or am I way off?

Finally where does Edward the third come into identification or is he harder to find?

Once again any help is greatly appreciated.

Kind Regards,
Lars




Yeah it's very technical (quite complex, although alot less so than Edward III coinage which is really tough to get one's head around).

Right let me try and explain it slightly clearer. In 1279 there was a recoinage (basically long cross pennies were phased out and the new design pennies [like yours] arrived and were minted in the millions, halfpennies and farthings were also introduced at the same time. As was an unsuccessful attempt at a Groat [the Edward I groat, very rare]).

From 1279-1335 the 'New Coinage' was issued and they are all in the same style as the one you have. So that covers Edward's I-III.

However, in 1335 Edward III's first coinage ceased production and work commenced on the Second coinage which ran till 1344 (although there's no pennies from the Second coinage). The penny was next seen in the 1344 recoinage known as the 'Florin Coinage' (when gold coins called Florins made their debut [and soon vanished as failures due to being overweight, the gold Noble arrived soon after and last a fair bit longer, about a century).

The pennies of the Florin coinage though look nothing like the 'New Coinage' types of 1279-1335. The New coinage looks like the king is wearing a shirt (the collar being visible). The Florin coinage onwards (to Henry VII) looks more like the top of one of those diving suits;

http://www.vigornia.co.uk/henry_VI_penny.htm


As for the prongs on the crown. Early Edward I coins have three prongs, late Edward I onwards have two prongs. With these things it's a process of elimination. If it has three then you know you've got an Edward I, if it's got 2 then it still could be any of the monarchs.

Edward III early issues are very rare though and thus it's generally best to eliminate him pretty much straight away (innocent of being Edward III until proven guilty approach).

The legends are the biggest give away usually;

EDW R & ED REX (Generally means Edward I early issues, short name is early)

EDWARD R, EDWAR (Generally means later Edward I and after, long name is late)

As for the lettering differences;

Lombardics = lowercase letters; n, h, m
Roman = uppercase letters; N, H, M,

Reversed letters = back to front letters, S's often come out backwards, the cross bar on the N is often running the wrong way. The reason for this is because die cutters have to cut the letters backwards so that upon striking they come out the right way around, but as you can no doubt appreciate sometimes they engraved them the right way around (to read) so that when the coin was struck they came out inverted! (Presuming all die cutters were literate of course! it might be the case that moneyers employed people to cut the dies in a "here's the inscription you've got to carve in, get to it" attitude, if any of the die engravers were illiterate then would they know whether an S was backwards or forwards?)

Open and closed E's, Early Edward I coins have open E's i.e it looks like E, by Class 6 the E's close up so they look like a backwards B, So Edward I late issues through to Edward III are all closed E type (except for Class 9B).

The classes are as follows;

1A, 1B, 1C, 1D (1279)
2A, 2B (1280)
3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, 3E, 3F, 3G (1280-81) [Which gives you an idea how much is being produced!]

4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, 4E (1282-89)
5A, 5B (1290-1)
6A, 6B (1292-6)
7A, 7B (1294-6)
8A, 8B (1294-1300)
9A, 9B (1300-02)

The legends change to the long 'EDWAR, EDWARD' variant from not onwards;

10A (1302-1310)

Crowns change from trifoliate to bifoliate from now onwards (i.e three pronged crowns to two prong crowns)

10B, 10C, 10D, 10E, 10F (1302-1310)


Edward II issues from now on;

11A, 11B, 11C (1310-14)
12 (1314)
13 (1315-18)
14 (1318-20)
15A, 15B , 15C (1320-1335) [Classed as Edward II issues, even 8 years in Edward III's reign]

Edward III issues from now on;

15D (1327-1335)


Where numbers change, i.e 1 to 2, 5 to 6 etc. Then that is a change of class. Classes are based on main design features, where the design features change quite a bit, i.e the king's face fattens out, the legend style changes, the crown type changes then the class changes. Minor 'progressive' alterations within a class i.e crown might alter it's shape or the positioning of something changes slightly then it's a sub-class.

The diagnostic for identifying Edward III 'New Coinage' pennies from Edward II types is that the legends change. Classes 15A-D are all similar, the difference between the Edward II 15A-C types and the Edward III 15D type is that the N's change from the Roman (N) to the Lombardics (n) type.

Often something so simple can change the sub-class and even the price-tag!

E.G Prices for London mint Coins of Class 15 in VG;

15A = £25
15B = £25
15C = £40
15D = £200

All because the N's changed!

Back to you coin, I should warn you differentiating between one class and another can be tough and differentiating between subclasses can be near impossible! I have an Edward I penny that I'm almost certain is from Class 4 (notice I say almost), however, narrowing it down to whether it's 4A/B/C/D Or E has proved pretty fruitless so far!

Edward I pennies are actually easy to identify when compared to Henry III longcross pennies, Edward III groats and the worst of them all a groat that says hENRICVS... (So is that Henry IV, V, VI or VII?)

Nightmare!









Valued Member
Ętheling's Avatar
United Kingdom
438 Posts
 Posted 02/26/2006  07:35 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Ętheling to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
quote:
Originally posted by KLD

The below one is a slighlty better picture of a different coin.
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c...2-edward.jpg
Is it King Edward 2nd? or am I way off?




What's the mint on that? (The mint being on the reverse, usually CIVITAS something, or VILLA something)*

This particular ones looks like it's going to be a tough one to pin down. I've looked through my Coincraft and my North Catalogues and the chins on the classes that your's falls into are a tad different, but wear can account for that. I'm also trying to tie in his shirt collar and see a style as close to as possible.

Based upon the legends it's either Edward I or II, the range looks to be from class 10D-15C, although for that one I favour 10C-10F. (Most Edward II's look to read EDWARRANGLDNSHYB, as opposed to EDWARANGLDNSHYB, notice the extra R.


*I ask for the mint because it can help to narrow down because some mints didn't issue certain classes, or if they did they only issued certain subclass of that class. London (LONDON) and Canterbury (CANTOR) are the annoying two that seems to issue just about everything.

Also Berwick Upon Tweed mint coins don't follow the normal classification system, coins from that mint are classed in their own system, due to the fact that they were made with local dies that look really crude and not much like anything else. Although I don't want to confuse you further than you already are so i'll sweep that under the carpet for now.



Valued Member
Ętheling's Avatar
United Kingdom
438 Posts
 Posted 02/26/2006  07:50 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Ętheling to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
That second coin I'm thinking 10F (which is Edweard I/II cross over period), based upon the description provided by Coincraft, although they have no picture to compare to. So I've asked the guys on the PCGS Collector's Universe forum what they think. It's always better to get a few opinions on these because they might point out something I may have missed!

Pillar of the Community
lim118's Avatar
Australia
1529 Posts
 Posted 02/26/2006  08:20 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add lim118 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Many thanks Ętheling,you are a "maha guru" of UK coinage.... I have learnt a lot today from your posts, but must confess I am still bewilded by it all...
Valued Member
Ętheling's Avatar
United Kingdom
438 Posts
 Posted 02/26/2006  09:30 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Ętheling to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I get bewildered by it too sometimes! I have to confess that most of that is not from memory, most of it is from refreshing my memory with the Coincraft book (which is an invaluable resource to have when trying to identify these things, Spinks is useless for hammered). The North catalogue is the definitive guide in depth but unless you know what you're looking for using that reference is like wading through mud, so you need to cross reference it with the Coincraft to get an adequate idea.

I do know some of the stuff I typed from the top of my head because I've identified (or tried to identify) quite a few of these coins in recent years. I love the practice actually. Although I often find myself stumped by some coins even with references.

If you think there's alot of terminology flying out with these you should see how much terminology goes with the gold coinage. Not only all the terms about but you also get different cross types in the legends, potent crosses, broken crosses, not to mention annulets, trefoils, spandrels, cusps. There's so much terminology you need a reference guide just to keep up.

Pillar of the Community
KLD's Avatar
Australia
1079 Posts
 Posted 02/26/2006  6:17 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add KLD to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Golly Gosh....it is more complex then I thought.

On the bright side I am learning something.

Here is the reverse to the coin I number 1252(3rd one)
Have I read it correctly "Civitas London"?

Once again thankyou.
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c...v-edward.jpg
Valued Member
Ętheling's Avatar
United Kingdom
438 Posts
 Posted 02/27/2006  02:08 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Ętheling to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yep CIVITAS LONDON (City of London), If it said something like VILLA BRISTOL then it would be (town of Bristol).

There's a whole list of mints and i'll provide you with a list at some point.
  Previous TopicReplies: 56 / Views: 10,299Next Topic
Page: of 4

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.47 seconds to rattle this change. Forums