| Author |
 Replies: 15 / Views: 1,096 |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
76706 Posts |
Errers and Varietys.
Edited by Errers and Varietys
09/24/2017 4:11 pm
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4412 Posts |
Edited by Tanman2001
09/24/2017 4:43 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
76706 Posts |
It is DDR-001. I just used John Wexler's numbers because I use his website more than anything else. I compared my DDR on coppercoins.com and it matched DDR-001. Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4412 Posts |
I meant DDR-002 sorry! The link I put goes to DDR-002.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
76706 Posts |
It's ok. It's DDR-001 because the reverse Doubling match's DDR-001. The Doubling doesn't match DDR-002.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
7234 Posts |
Maybe it was struck before the die gouge happened?  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
76706 Posts |
That's exactly what I'm thinking Mark.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4412 Posts |
 I'm not convinced, can you get closer pics? |
|
Pillar of the Community
7234 Posts |
These kind of minor varieties are too much for me to remember but what you are saying is the 001 has the distorted letters "LB" AND the die gouge in back of Lincoln's neck? And then the 002 has normal "LB" with just the small notches on the bottom left sides of the letters and NO die gouge?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
76706 Posts |
Yeah, I'll try to get better pictures later. Unfortunately, I use a cheap 20 dollar Tracfone powered by Android. I will try to get a better pictures. If you look at EPU, the Doubling is strected and distorted and matches DDR-001 and not DDR-002.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
7234 Posts |
This seems to be getting complicated -  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2563 Posts |
It is most certainly not the 001. More likely to be the 002 with the more minor doubling that is presented. Even with the bad pics, you can tell that the doubling is not as pronounced as the 001. Sorry!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
76706 Posts |
Sorry, but it isn't DDR-002 as the Doubling is incorrect and not the same on JFM and EPM. Look at the EPU. It matches DDR-001 and not DDR-002. Sorry, but I'm not in agreement.
Errers and Varietys.
Edited by Errers and Varietys
09/25/2017 12:03 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4412 Posts |
Here's my example of WDDR-002 (Not the same as DDR-002): I no longer believe your coin is DDR-002 but it is WDDR-002.   Distortion on E PLURIBUS UNUM is identical Doubling on LB is identical |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2563 Posts |
Sorry, man, but it just isn't the 001. The doubling is far too weak to be it. It's either 002 or WDDO-002. No way it could be the 001.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
76706 Posts |
Okay, now I see your point now. Thank you for the help. It's WDDR-002 then. I'm sorry guys. It must of misidentified it by mistake.  Errers and Varietys.
Edited by Errers and Varietys
09/26/2017 01:48 am
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,096 |
|
Posted 09/24/2017 4:10 pm
