1934 1c Double Die WDDO-006

Not 006 and I do not think it is a doubled die at all,sorry.
John1

i agree also...but vary nice photos!

This post by COOP on another 1934 Lincoln thread is what swayed me on the DDO. My coin is to the right of COOP's illustrations posted in the thread
http://goccf.com/t/299889

Actually the illustrations he posted show the standard 1934 against the doubled. Those distinctions would have been no different in the P. The only distinctions would be the die markers. In fact, here's a mint state P with the same "Normal" distinctive features as what COOP cited. Just two of the examples, although I could have kept going.

Thanks Stoneman. What about the 1 in the date, the thick Liberty, the thick N just like the pic and the 9 seems to be just like the pic (you can have DDO and md). Anyway, not trying to be argumentative and it's not a valuable coin or anything. However, I am just saying ignoring the date (differences in opinion), all the other features match imho.

Are you saying that you feel this is a doubled die ?
The OP's coin displays what I normally associate as circulation widening of the devices. Especially note the TY of Liberty. The 193 of the date showes eather damage or MD'ing.
The widening of the devices showes none of the distortion which defines a class VI doubled die like my 1934-DDO-002 shown here. ( Sorry, I'm on my phone and don't have access to the detail pics.)

PS , Thanks ! I got lucky