Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsRoyal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

RPM And DDO Affectionados, A Study

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 829Next Topic  
Rest in Peace
Crazyb0's Avatar
10197 Posts
 Posted 02/08/2018  3:42 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Crazyb0 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Was attempting to attribute a group of 1957D RPM's. While using my home-made 25x loupe that I use to ID all potential doublings before putting under the scope, (I save time this way instead of every coin under scope), my Mark 1 eyeball identified of these four pictured RPM's as #1 & 2 were the same as were #3 & 4. Notice the differences? Not a one are the same one...now comes the work.

This is just to show the minute differences involved in the IDing of the mint doubling events, similar is NOT identical! It involves the correct placement, shapes and rotaion/direction of each mintmark. You can join me in the IDing of these if you want some practice, be back after a while!

RPM-And-DDO-Affectionados,-A-Study
Pillar of the Community
SF11Dude's Avatar
United States
746 Posts
 Posted 02/08/2018  3:46 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SF11Dude to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Interesting Crazyb0. Could the differences in the relative size of the screen captures (Looks like #2 is bigger than #3 & #4) and #3 & #4 appearing larger due to distance that #1...and/or the die state/stage that could be affecting the line gaps...since these are not UNC coins?
Rest in Peace
Crazyb0's Avatar
10197 Posts
 Posted 02/08/2018  4:09 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Crazyb0 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hey Dude!... same resolution, focal distance and adjustment, all snapped together. So far have #2 as definite ID (1957D-1MM-030) and #3 as possible 038. Have about 15 pix to liniate from CC then begin a comparison. What you will find is this exact thing, MMs will look real close but placement is a hair off. I like Coppercoins because he seems to pick this up over John Wexler on a few where he calls a similar one the same.
Edited by Crazyb0
02/08/2018 4:09 pm
Rest in Peace
moxking's Avatar
United States
17900 Posts
 Posted 02/08/2018  4:10 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add moxking to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm glad their is an interesting variety of varieties to attract new collectors with nearly free treasure hunting.

If a variety doesn't jump off the coin and slap me in the face it's unlikely ill spend the time necessary to look further.

Another example of different genres that we can appreciate and respect even if it isn't our thing.
Pillar of the Community
shotgung's Avatar
United States
1101 Posts
 Posted 02/08/2018  4:13 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add shotgung to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
If a variety doesn't jump off the coin and slap me in the face it's unlikely ill spend the time necessary to look further.
Ditto
Pillar of the Community
SF11Dude's Avatar
United States
746 Posts
 Posted 02/08/2018  4:16 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SF11Dude to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Good job on this Crazyb0...

I am with moxking and shotgung...BUT if I had measuring software like the higher end Dinolites come with, it would be worth drawing tic-tac-toe boards. Lol!

Rest in Peace
Crazyb0's Avatar
10197 Posts
 Posted 02/08/2018  5:29 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Crazyb0 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
If anyone has been following this, these are the results, I leave one for you to tell me which one of the two marked it is. They are essentially IDENTICAL in placement, upon resizing to match it was so. There is only ONE fine point of difference that definitely shows which mintmark attribution it is, the 1957D-1MM-019, or the 1957D-1MM-029. If you can tell me what that one difference is that proves the ID, I'll send you a couple BU LWC's with RPMs, seeing can't sell the &%$# things. Results:

RPM-And-DDO-Affectionados,-A-Study

Now, the mini quiz:

RPM-And-DDO-Affectionados,-A-Study
Edited by Crazyb0
02/08/2018 5:32 pm
Pillar of the Community
SF11Dude's Avatar
United States
746 Posts
 Posted 02/08/2018  5:36 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SF11Dude to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Buzzzz...the 19 should have clogged devices?
Pillar of the Community
United States
1901 Posts
 Posted 02/08/2018  6:26 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Mrzllewellyn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It is 029 final answer
Pillar of the Community
United States
1901 Posts
 Posted 02/08/2018  6:28 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Mrzllewellyn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The top serif is wrong on 019
  Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 829Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.32 seconds to rattle this change. Forums