Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. 300,000 items to help build your collection! Specializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

ICCS // NGC Cross Continuum...and Some Observations.

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 1,480Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community

Canada
1461 Posts
 Posted 07/06/2018  1:38 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add TheCoinHunter to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I've embarked on this little cross project to better understand some of the nuances of the TPGs.

Most of this is nothing but the obvious but here are some observations...

1. Consistent discrepancy in the EF - AU range. Not all, but most coins I've sent in graded EF by ICCS have come back in AU from NGC. The amount of coins and the gap isn't as obvious for VF grades. Actually many VF-20 Coins crossed at par or within one grade.
2. ICCS almost always automatically penalizes weak strikes and coins Struck Through Grease, etc...Not sure if this is Brian's grading methodology or just carelessness. NGC seems to pay far more attention to that aspect of coin grading.
3. NGC is consistently stingier on MS62+ coinage. Although more so in higher denominations and later years, nevertheless consistently so. Frankly I am concerned how many over graded silver dollars actually sit in ICCS holders at the moment.
4. ICCS consistently overlooks problem coins and holders them without comment. It's sometimes difficult to understand how ICCS concludes these grades. It seems that sometimes they choose to net grade a problem coin and sometimes true grade with a comment and without much rationale behind it.
5. NGC often mis-attributes coins. It's not a complicated science and certainly shouldn't be so for a grading company that earns a living doing it.


Edited by TheCoinHunter
07/06/2018 1:50 pm
Rest in Peace
moxking's Avatar
United States
17900 Posts
 Posted 07/06/2018  2:31 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add moxking to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
5? Misattributes? If it's a variety that is recognized by NGC and listed as such on the submissions invoice, then it's listed as such if it is.

If someone submits without listing it as a variety it will be caused as a no variety example.
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1461 Posts
 Posted 07/06/2018  2:52 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add TheCoinHunter to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Moxking....Unfortunately I've seen numerous coins where varieties were outright wrong. A few Canadian ones that have been posted here over time (eg; Large 5 vs Small 5). I've also had some issues with edge lettering varieties with a few of German coins in the past. I'm not saying that it happens all the time, but it does happen. NGC will be the first to tell you that their Canadian varieties are "work in progress" and they do not have a complete list available on their Canadian variety page.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
vonigohcr's Avatar
Canada
665 Posts
 Posted 07/06/2018  4:15 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add vonigohcr to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
CoinHunter;

I don't present myself as an experienced grader and will defer to most on this forum but I would like to ask you the question under categories 1,2,& 3 in your list, who do you believe ICCS or NGC? I infer from your post that you think ICCS are inconsistent on problem coins and NGC makes varietal mistakes but on a plain vanilla VF, EF, AU, MS... whose grade would you believe?
Moderator
Learn More...
SPP-Ottawa's Avatar
Canada
10458 Posts
 Posted 07/06/2018  5:43 pm  Show Profile   Check SPP-Ottawa's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add SPP-Ottawa to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
TheCoinHunter, I appreciate your candour with respect to sharing your experiences here. Not all of us have the resources to submit to multiple grading companies and I see this sort of information quite informative and valuable with respect to Canadian coins. So much so, I'd like to see your results published eventually, perhaps in the CN Journal. I have a similar pool of data with mint state coins between ICCS and PCGS, but namely for the 1c, NFLD 1c, silver 5c and modern coins...

For most collectors, Point #4 above should be the most alarming. 10 years ago, I had my entire collection in ICCS holders, many bought sight unseen back in the day... it has been a long, expensive, and sometimes painful journey to get my collection into PCGS holders, and I would say that learning how to identify problem coins, dealing with weak strikes and eye appeal have made it worth the cost, as I move forward with my collections. As to whose grade I believe... I trust my own eyes, and I don't send a coin south of the border to PCGS unless I am pretty darn sure what to expect for the results.

"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert Oppenheimer

Content of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_US

My eBay store
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1461 Posts
 Posted 07/07/2018  11:31 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add TheCoinHunter to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I don't present myself as an experienced grader and will defer to most on this forum but I would like to ask you the question under categories 1,2,& 3 in your list, who do you believe ICCS or NGC? I infer from your post that you think ICCS are inconsistent on problem coins and NGC makes varietal mistakes but on a plain vanilla VF, EF, AU, MS... whose grade would you believe?


I'm not sure there is a right answer to your question(s). It largely depends on who you ask and even where you live and collect. Some collectors don't believe in TPGs at all, some believe in them too much. I guess the standard cliche response by many collectors would be "Buy the coin and not the holder" and that certainly proves to be true...BUT...A more refined version of that should be "For best value, buy the most eye appealing coin not the most appealing grade" (Raw or graded). There are MANY high graded coins that have zip eye appeal (to most) and sell for a fraction of their book values. At the other end, there are many very pretty coins that get excellent per grade price performance because of their eye appeal. The formula obviously gets more complex with more rare coins where eye appeal is often traded in for the chance to own one but that's a whole different chapter on collector psyche. In my opinion, in the day and age of internet sales and trading, TPGs have become an integral part of collecting (or at least online trading). They play an essential role in establishing a relatively rational base price for a coin. I think if you learn the nuances and the pros/cons of each TPG, you're ahead of the game. Who to believe?...Well, even with it's issues, ICCS still holds significant support in the Canadian market and will continue to do so. As a Canadian dealer, I still send many of my coins to ICCS to resell. However, the market support for ICCS (and this is my opinion only) has become more of a habit that a test of grading acumen. Largely because it is very cost efficient, recognized in Canada, ease of resale, dealer supported and because many coins can be numerically graded that would otherwise fail the NGC/PCGS sniff test. NGC (&PCGS) on the other hand is a world coin grader and to them Canada is just another piece of the world and therefore doesn't get "extra" attention and/or variety knowledge that ICCS offers. It often grades higher in mid grades but the market generally discounts NGC holdered coins for that reason. But it does open the US market for Canadian coins and offers a certain level of guarantee that a coin is relatively problem free and certainly protects the buyers with respect to authenticity. It offers significantly better statistical information on graded coins and provides public registry set options for collectors.
Bedrock of the Community
basebal21's Avatar
13014 Posts
 Posted 07/07/2018  6:14 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add basebal21 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I've never used ICCS so I cannot comment on them but I can add a little more in regards to NGC and PCGS. For varieties NGC is actually my least favorite of the US TPGs as they are the most restrictive on what they will and will not do. Some are automatic and they all do get those wrong sometimes, fortunately at this point though it is more a hassle than anything. I know that PCGS will fix those for free if you contact them and show they mislabeled it including covering the shipping (for US customers anyway but I don't see why not for Canadian ones too) and NGC does the same I believe.

As for grading the XF to AU is where I have noticed where of the differences with NGC and PCGS grading is,possibly with ICCS too unless you guys think it's more inconsistency. That difference is with how they treat luster. PCGS generally will generally hold a coin to XF if there isn't enough luster left even if the detail is there for low AU, NGC is more likely to grade it in the low AU based off the detail and not penalize it as much with luster. Overall I would say NGC favors technical grading a little bit more with less emphasis on eye appeal/luster while PCGS overall puts a greater emphasis on eye appeal/luster in higher grades. With that said the majority of coins will be within plus or minus 1 grade if sent to either and most will actually be the same grade.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Canada
5586 Posts
 Posted 07/07/2018  7:25 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add okiecoiner to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Coinhunter: I agree with your comment about a "sniff test" as applied to ICCS. My big fault with them is that they almost completely ignore the surface, the surface luster or lack thereof, artificial toning and obvious cleanings. The are the epitomy of "technical grading" ..meaning wear only. They seem like they have broken thumbs when it comes to anything that should be in the "remarks" section and they are adverse to body-bagging anything when, in fact, they should hand out more bags or "details" coins. Needless to say, I see little or no use for any TPG unless you are a very active dealer or a high-end/high dollar collector.
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1461 Posts
 Posted 07/08/2018  11:42 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add TheCoinHunter to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
For varieties NGC is actually my least favorite of the US TPGs as they are the most restrictive on what they will and will not do. Some are automatic and they all do get those wrong sometimes....


Totally agree. NGC does admit that their variety database is work in progress. One never knows if you should be identifying a variety on submissions or whether its included in the tier and they'll pick it up. Personally I think all TPGs should be identifying all known major varieties by default and including them in the tier cost (ICCS does).

Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
vonigohcr's Avatar
Canada
665 Posts
 Posted 07/08/2018  4:17 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add vonigohcr to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks to everyone who answered; there is a lot of good information here and a lot to digest. I own a couple of coins from ICCS & NGC though I have never submitted to either myself. I have considered ICCS just to see if what I would grade a coin is consistent with what a TPG would grade. I am reluctant to use NGC or PCGS simply because I want to avoid border complications and because I am collecting, not reselling, the value of a TPG holder is less important to me.

At the end of the day, I buy what I like to collect but it is good to understand whether the asking price of a coin is appropriate to the market value.
  Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 1,480Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.36 seconds to rattle this change. Forums