| Author |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,341 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
265 Posts |
A couple of things. First, I am trying to figure out grading. I'm going by the PCGS photo grade on my phone and trying to compare coins. I'm estimating this at an MS-62. If you disagree, can you please point out which part you are looking at that makes you disagree, so I can better understand what I missed.   Also, this was my grandfather's that my father let me keep after he passed away. I'm not looking to sell for that reason, but should this be sent off for grading anyway? Not sure I care to unless it would be ultimately better from a conservation standpoint. Or I could just leave it in a flip and not worry about it. Any opinion is very appreciated on both matters.
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36800 Posts |
MS-61, lots of marks on all surfaces but I don't see any wear in the normal spots. I would send this one off to get it TPG graded.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
265 Posts |
Thank You for your help. Hey, at least I was close, so I'm starting to get the hang of it.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'll say 62, very nice example.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18681 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
819 Posts |
MS 62. Yes send it in. It will have more protection than being in a flip
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
I would go MS63 here. Nice luster and an average strike with no major distractions give this one nice eye appeal. The rim bump at 6:00 reverse looks minor in the image and I assume it is minor.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4846 Posts |
I agree with BH, I think it's a 63
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
265 Posts |
The rim is minor and I couldn't really notice much of an issue in hand.
|
| |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,341 |
|