Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection! Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes.








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Where To Draw The Line On What Counts As Damage

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 3,150Next Topic  
Valued Member
Quatchi's Avatar
Canada
228 Posts
 Posted 01/31/2019  9:07 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Quatchi to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
At what point would one call a coin cleaned or damaged?
Example: The coin in question is in an ICCS MS-63 holder. The coin has a very small black spot of some kind and it looks like someone has tried to remove it with something. Unfortunately, this unsuccessful spot removal attempt has disturbed the lustre (tiny scratch) near the mark, but it is ONLY visible under magnification. This disturbance is not detectable with the naked eye and is much smaller than some of the bag marks on the coin.
ICCS didn't indicate anything on the holder, I'm thinking maybe they just counted it as a bag mark.

Your thoughts?
New Member
United States
37 Posts
 Posted 01/31/2019  9:10 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Tmorge5 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I need a picture to determine. In my opinion. It comes down to a case by case basis.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Canada
5585 Posts
 Posted 02/01/2019  05:24 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add okiecoiner to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
ICCS grades on, essentially, just coin "wear" .. they very seldom will annotate in "remarks" about cleaning or spots or luster interruptions. ICCS grades are often referred to as 'Technical grades", paying little or no attention to surface, whether plus or minus. Other TPG's will normally make note of them, depending upon the severity of them. Some TPG's are very critical about dips and cleaning, once above 62 or so.
Edited by okiecoiner
02/01/2019 05:27 am
Bedrock of the Community
sel_69l's Avatar
Australia
21786 Posts
 Posted 02/01/2019  06:29 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add sel_69l to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Everyone understands what damage is, in a general sense.
Different collectors will tolerate different types of damage to different extents.

An interesting question that will have a personal subjective answer and not an objective non personal answer.

My approach to thinking about buying a particular damaged coin is to ask myself:
'How much would the damage that affects this coin influence the buyer in a negative way, if they were to buy the coin off me?'
I would then factor this consideration into my value judgement, before considering to buy the coin for myself.


"comment" on a slab affects the value of a coin independent of the grading.
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5324 Posts
 Posted 02/01/2019  08:32 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add john100 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
That is why there are good MS 63 and crappy 63, just sell or trade it for another, ICCS does not regard eye appeal in their grading
Bedrock of the Community
basebal21's Avatar
13014 Posts
 Posted 02/02/2019  12:55 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add basebal21 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
ICCS grades on, essentially, just coin "wear" .. they very seldom will annotate in "remarks" about cleaning or spots or luster interruptions. ICCS grades are often referred to as 'Technical grades", paying little or no attention to surface, whether plus or minus.


If that's true, that wouldn't even be technical grading. Technical grading does include surfaces and the preservation, but really even wear deals with surfaces. Ignoring eye appeal is completely different than ignoring surface quality and problems.
Valued Member
Quatchi's Avatar
Canada
228 Posts
 Posted 02/02/2019  7:02 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Quatchi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I think I'm going to look at it this way. The damage isolated to one tiny spot and is not visible without magnification, and it is smaller than some bag marks on this MS-63 coin. Whether ICCS missed it, intentionally ignored it, or net graded it, I don't know. I'm happy with it the way it is, so I'm going to keep it.
  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 3,150Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.23 seconds to rattle this change. Forums