| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,423 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
59 Posts |
One gold and highly glossy finish almost like a proof finish, the other soft satin like finish. Did the satin one miss a minting process? darn can't get pictures to load.
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
59 Posts |
wow, thank you. Apparently I have a VIP strike coin. I wonder what the value is as apparently only 600 struck.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
59 Posts |
Pics  
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
How did you come to the conclusion that your coin is a VIP strike? John1 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
59 Posts |
Well the only ones struck in 2000P with this finish were the Goodacre, First Stike and perhaps some wash trials but this doesn't have the wash marks I have seen on those coins. What do you think it is?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3471 Posts |
They look like normal strike Sacagawea's to me. I have several VIP strike coins in government packaging as well as TPG slabs. The VIP coins were struck on specially prepared planchets with higher stamping pressure.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
59 Posts |
Nine, how come it has the satin finish versus the top shiny gold finish? There is stark difference in the finish between the two.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
59 Posts |
I guess it could be the second variety of the Cheerios coin with regular strike tail feathers.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Quote: What do you think it is? I don't know,and I don't see how a TPG could tell the difference either. John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
Both look normal to me.  to the CCF!
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
59 Posts |
first one has a highly polished/glossy finish the other a satin/soft finish.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36770 Posts |
Finishes vary on circulation strike coins. Yours look like normal circulation coins.
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,423 |
|