| Author |
Replies: 20 / Views: 2,948 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4692 Posts |
What you think?  
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8938 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
594 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4692 Posts |
Additional pics.  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1023 Posts |
Gonna go on a limb here and say something most likely completely wrong and crazy. PR58
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21786 Posts |
Jon: maybe not right, but not so crazy. Very difficult to assess for MS62 or above.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
93 Posts |
58. A ton of contact but not a bad coin
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
It does look like a proof in these images, proof-like anyway. PR62.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1023 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
Appears to be in a slab so difficult to tell.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4692 Posts |
Some close guesses, but no one has it exactly right. Straight grade.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
287 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
414 Posts |
cleaner images of the fields would help but despite what appears to be "fuzz" on the devices and fields, the coin looks clean. I'll join the MS63-MS64 bandwagon.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2156 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
861 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 20 / Views: 2,948 |