| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 859 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6116 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5887 Posts |
Too minor again? As far as I'm concerned, the date is enough for a listing IMO.
-CH27
Collector of U.S. Coins, Varieties, and Colonial Coinage
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
In this particular case, I agree with Mr. Wiles. 
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
 . That is minor throughout.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74707 Posts |
It's minor, but in my opinion, not too minor to be listed. It's a good one.
Errers and Varietys.
Edited by Errers and Varietys 09/11/2019 12:49 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8938 Posts |
Well, you can get it listed by Tanman.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2376 Posts |
Truly a shame. I guess the only way the 1924-S DDO-001 got listed was because the late die state is distorted in just the right way. The earlier die states don't show even half the doubling of this coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6116 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74707 Posts |
Tropicalbats, the 1946 D DDO-001 is much more minor than your example!
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1070 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2376 Posts |
I'm usually not half bad at recognizing a class VI but that 46-D Would probably slip right past me!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5887 Posts |
I wouldn't even keep that 1946-D. That would be such a difficult one to notice.
-CH27
Collector of U.S. Coins, Varieties, and Colonial Coinage
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 859 |
|