| Author |
 Replies: 11 / Views: 1,636 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7195 Posts |
A sister to the 1916 s, a crusty original, how would you grade her?   |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2189 Posts |
I will take a stab at AU-58. Just enough light rubs to keep from an MS. Just my opinion.
beautiful early date!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8938 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
AU-58. Eye Appeal 10/10.
Gorgeous. So very close to 64. Really love that one.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18687 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
AU-58+ Eye appeal 10/10 . Ever so carefully get that black spot off her face and you will have one dynamite looking coin . This is a classic case of an AU coin looking better than an MS-61 or 62 .  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'd say Au-58 as well. Most attractive.
|
|
Forum Mom
 United States
5877 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7195 Posts |
I believe this coin was MS when I won the ebay bid but the seller shipped it loose in tissue paper giving it the slight rub. |
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
Since the rub was not, strickly, circulated this might hit MS with NGC or PCGS as they will catch the lack of wear with only the top of the toning affected.
I had the exact same problem with a 1814 LC. I just left it in the sun for two months and PCGS gave it a 63, which thrilled me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36839 Posts |
AU-58 to be on the safe side.
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,636 |
|
Posted 10/31/2019 10:57 am
