I think PCGS really did a bad job with this one. They graded it MS66, and comparing it to their other examples, this coin was clearly very undergraded.
My coin(MS66)- PCGS MS68 example- PCGS MS67 example-
PCGS had the advantage of seeing these coins in hand, but from the pics it's obvious that the strike quality of the 68 is far superior to that of the 66.
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning... -from PCGS website
Without being able to rotate the coin under light it appears it was limited by the cheek and possibly luster quality. 68 is out of the question but I don't think anyone would really argue against a 67. That said PCGS has been tight for a long time now
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use