| Author |
 Replies: 9 / Views: 1,846 |
|
|
New Member
United States
15 Posts |
Hi I'm just trying to figure out what is worth keeping and not worth keeping during my Nickel Roll Hunts. I'm submitting some questionable (In my opinion) Nickels, and wanted to see some opinions on them, and what grade you all think they are.
|
|
|
|
New Member
 United States
15 Posts |
1   |
|
New Member
United States
15 Posts |
2   |
|
New Member
United States
15 Posts |
3   |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
These all seem to be in EF or AU condition, and as such would not bring much of a premium.  to the CCF@ |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts |
XF to AU. I might keep the 1957, but the 1964s are spenders if not MS, just too many of them made. A million years from now the most likely thing a future archaeologist will find from our civilization is a 1964 nickel in XF or better.
|
|
New Member
United States
15 Posts |
Thanks CoinFrog. I've been Nickel Roll Hunting for a little while, and am still trying to get a grip on what is worth and not worth keeping.
|
|
New Member
United States
15 Posts |
Thanks Nick. Yeah when I'm hunting I have Jars setup per Decade (1964 and under) to go through at a later date and noticed and extreme overabundance of 1964 WAYYY over anything else. I'm still trying to get a rhythm going when Nickel Hunting
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
To CCF , In the condition that those Nickels are in I wouldn't save anything after 1955 , but that's just me . Of cause is you find an AU-58 or better 1956-1963 or any Nickel that you think is an error , then go ahead and save it .  |
|
New Member
Brazil
25 Posts |
Personally I'd save them. If anything you are adding to your savings, not to mention in time to come they may be a story to tell with someone sitting on your knee. Not to mention, who knows what the future holds.
|
| |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,846 |
|
Posted 06/17/2020 2:58 pm
