| Author |
 Replies: 13 / Views: 1,538 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
This one's in an INS 65 "vintage photo" double wide holder but I think it only makes 64. Rather large hit on the reverse. Luster is fantastic.   Edited by fenton
07/06/2020 6:42 pm
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36782 Posts |
My gut says MS-64 but I've seen many 65's with the same amount of marks on the cheek.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
2224 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1788 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1273 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
I'll join the 64 group as well.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1298 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
A pic with more light on the left obverse field would help.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18680 Posts |
strike is a little better than normal for this year. I think you are spot on with the grade. MS64
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4989 Posts |
The holder on this one is pretty awesome. Circa 1988. INS was one of the first grading companies. Didn't grade to quite the same standards as today, but were pretty harsh on any altered surfaces from what I hear.  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18680 Posts |
i dont think the top TPG's would slab this at 65 but it is a nice coin |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Guessing it's probably a coin flip between 64 and 65 with a resubmit but I like the vintage holder so going to keep this one as is. The luster on this one is exceptional which might get it the 65; it doesn't really show on the photos.
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,538 |
|
Posted 07/06/2020 6:32 pm
