I have red a lot of crap from that company and had a lot of laughs, but now seeing them calling an average circulated and AU55 certified coin a
"admirable clarity of design resulting to the higher points, a semi-Prooflike characteristic to the surfaces enabling clear reflectivity across the fields"
just brings numismatics to another level of unprofessional behaviour.
How far will this company go?
Where are the limits of exaggeration on a clearly circulated average low-grade piece?
PCGS really isn't the best at grading much outside of US stuff, and even then I often find their grades to be 'off'. But I do not ender stand how the straight graded with that big stain across the obverse. Smh.
The description sounds as if a bunch of numismatic-related jargon were random scrambled and entered into a computer program that arranged them to make a sentence with proper English grammar and syntax.
I agree that the grade is high - I might say Extra Fine using US standards but there are problems with this one. Good advice would be to buy the coin NOT the grade as shown.
There was a time when a coin with what looks like corrosion in the dentils under the denomination would return in a body bag.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use